UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Catastrophizing-a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with low back pain: a systematic review


Wertli, Maria M; Eugster, Rebekka; Held, Ulrike; Steurer, Johann; Kofmehl, Reto; Weiser, Sherri (2014). Catastrophizing-a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with low back pain: a systematic review. The Spine Journal:2639-2657.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Psychological factors including catastrophizing thoughts are believed to influence the development of chronic low back pain (LBP). PURPOSE To assess the prognostic importance of catastrophizing as a coping strategy in patients with LBP. STUDY DESIGN This is a systematic review. PATIENT SAMPLE This study included patients with LBP. OUTCOME MEASURES Work-related outcomes and perceived measures including return to work, pain, and disability. METHODS In September 2012, the following databases were searched: BIOSIS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, OTSeeker, PeDRO, PsycInfo, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. To ensure completeness of the search, a hand search and a search of bibliographies were conducted and all relevant references included. All observational studies investigating the prognostic value of catastrophizing in patients with LBP were eligible. Included were studies with 100 and more patients and follow-up of at least 3 months. Excluded were studies with poor methodological quality, short follow-up duration, and small sample size. RESULTS A total of 1,473 references were retrieved, and 706 references remained after the removal of duplicates. For 77 references, the full text was assessed and 19 publications based on 16 studies were included. Of four studies that investigated work-related outcomes, two found catastrophizing to be associated with work status. Most studies that investigated self-reported outcome measures (n=8, 66%) found catastrophizing to be associated with pain and disability at follow-up in acute, subacute, and chronic LBP patients. In most studies that applied cutoff values, patients identified as high catastrophizers experienced a worse outcome compared with low catastrophizers (n=5, 83%). CONCLUSIONS There is some evidence that catastrophizing as a coping strategy might lead to delayed recovery. The influence of catastrophizing in patients with LBP is not fully established and should be further investigated. Of particular importance is the establishment of cutoff levels for identifying patients at risk.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Psychological factors including catastrophizing thoughts are believed to influence the development of chronic low back pain (LBP). PURPOSE To assess the prognostic importance of catastrophizing as a coping strategy in patients with LBP. STUDY DESIGN This is a systematic review. PATIENT SAMPLE This study included patients with LBP. OUTCOME MEASURES Work-related outcomes and perceived measures including return to work, pain, and disability. METHODS In September 2012, the following databases were searched: BIOSIS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, OTSeeker, PeDRO, PsycInfo, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. To ensure completeness of the search, a hand search and a search of bibliographies were conducted and all relevant references included. All observational studies investigating the prognostic value of catastrophizing in patients with LBP were eligible. Included were studies with 100 and more patients and follow-up of at least 3 months. Excluded were studies with poor methodological quality, short follow-up duration, and small sample size. RESULTS A total of 1,473 references were retrieved, and 706 references remained after the removal of duplicates. For 77 references, the full text was assessed and 19 publications based on 16 studies were included. Of four studies that investigated work-related outcomes, two found catastrophizing to be associated with work status. Most studies that investigated self-reported outcome measures (n=8, 66%) found catastrophizing to be associated with pain and disability at follow-up in acute, subacute, and chronic LBP patients. In most studies that applied cutoff values, patients identified as high catastrophizers experienced a worse outcome compared with low catastrophizers (n=5, 83%). CONCLUSIONS There is some evidence that catastrophizing as a coping strategy might lead to delayed recovery. The influence of catastrophizing in patients with LBP is not fully established and should be further investigated. Of particular importance is the establishment of cutoff levels for identifying patients at risk.

Citations

29 citations in Web of Science®
25 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

30 downloads since deposited on 21 Nov 2014
22 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic and Policlinic for Internal Medicine
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:7 March 2014
Deposited On:21 Nov 2014 11:46
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 18:32
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1529-9430
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.003
PubMed ID:24607845
Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-101107

Download

[img]
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 1MB
View at publisher
[img]
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 301kB

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations