UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA-GMO-BE-2011-98) for the placing on the market of herbicide-tolerant genetically modified soybean FG72 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Bayer CropScience


Arpaia, Salvatore; Birch, Andrew Nicholas Edmund; Chesson, Andrew; du Jardin, Patrick; Gathmann, Achim; Gropp, Jürgen; Herman, Lieve; Hoen-Sorteberg, Hilde-Gunn; Jones, Huw; Kiss, József; Kleter, Gijs; Løvik, Martinus; Messéan, Antoine; Naegeli, Hanspeter; Kaare Magne Nielsen, Kaare Magne; Ovesná, Jaroslava; Perry, Joe; Rostoks, Nils; Tebbe, Christoph (2015). Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA-GMO-BE-2011-98) for the placing on the market of herbicide-tolerant genetically modified soybean FG72 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Bayer CropScience. EFSA Journal, 13(7):4167.

Abstract

Soybean FG72 was developed by biolistic transformation to express the HPPD W336 and 2mEPSPS proteins, which confer tolerance to isoxaflutole- and glyphosate-based herbicides. The molecular characterisation of soybean FG72 did not give rise to safety issues. The agronomic and phenotypic characteristics of soybean FG72 tested under field conditions revealed no biologically relevant differences between soybean FG72 and its conventional counterpart that would give rise to any food and feed or environmental safety concerns. No differences in the compositional data requiring further safety assessment were identified. There were no concerns regarding the potential toxicity and allergenicity of the newly expressed proteins HPPD W336 and 2mEPSPS, and no evidence that the genetic modification might significantly change the overall allergenicity of soybean FG72. The nutritional characteristics of soybean FG72 is not expected to differ from that of non-GM soybean varieties. There are no indications of an increased likelihood of establishment and spread of feral soybean plants. Considering the scope of this application, interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment were not considered to be an issue. Risks associated with an unlikely but theoretically possible horizontal gene transfer from soybean FG72 to bacteria have not been identified. The monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the scope of the application. In conclusion, the EFSA GMO Panel considers that the information available for soybean FG72 addresses the scientific comments raised by Member States and that soybean FG72, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and non-GM soybean reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment in the context of the scope of this application.

Soybean FG72 was developed by biolistic transformation to express the HPPD W336 and 2mEPSPS proteins, which confer tolerance to isoxaflutole- and glyphosate-based herbicides. The molecular characterisation of soybean FG72 did not give rise to safety issues. The agronomic and phenotypic characteristics of soybean FG72 tested under field conditions revealed no biologically relevant differences between soybean FG72 and its conventional counterpart that would give rise to any food and feed or environmental safety concerns. No differences in the compositional data requiring further safety assessment were identified. There were no concerns regarding the potential toxicity and allergenicity of the newly expressed proteins HPPD W336 and 2mEPSPS, and no evidence that the genetic modification might significantly change the overall allergenicity of soybean FG72. The nutritional characteristics of soybean FG72 is not expected to differ from that of non-GM soybean varieties. There are no indications of an increased likelihood of establishment and spread of feral soybean plants. Considering the scope of this application, interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment were not considered to be an issue. Risks associated with an unlikely but theoretically possible horizontal gene transfer from soybean FG72 to bacteria have not been identified. The monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the scope of the application. In conclusion, the EFSA GMO Panel considers that the information available for soybean FG72 addresses the scientific comments raised by Member States and that soybean FG72, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and non-GM soybean reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment in the context of the scope of this application.

Altmetrics

Downloads

2 downloads since deposited on 03 Feb 2016
2 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Institute of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
Uncontrolled Keywords:GMO, soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), FG72, herbicide tolerance, HPPD W336, 2mEPSPS, Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
Language:English
Date:16 July 2015
Deposited On:03 Feb 2016 11:54
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 19:57
Publisher:European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma
ISSN:1831-4732
Additional Information:The EFSA Journal is a publication of the European Food Safety Authority, an agency of the European Union.
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4167
Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-119950

Download

[img]
Preview
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 483kB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations