UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Clinical performance of a new bidirectional rotational mechanical lead extraction sheath


Starck, Christoph T; Steffel, Jan; Caliskan, Etem; Holubec, Tomas; Schoenrath, Felix; Maisano, Francesco; Falk, Volkmar (2016). Clinical performance of a new bidirectional rotational mechanical lead extraction sheath. Europace, 18(2):253-256.

Abstract

AIMS: We investigated the safety and efficacy of a new bidirectional rotational mechanical extraction sheath (Evolution RL, Cook Medical, USA).
METHODS AND RESULTS: From April 2013 until September 2014, we performed lead extraction procedures in 71 patients with 112 leads scheduled for extraction. During this time period, we used the new Evolution RL rotational sheath in 40 patients on 52 leads (24 pacemaker leads and 28 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads) scheduled for extraction. The mean lead implant duration in these patients was 100.2 (22-271) months. Forty leads were right ventricular leads, 10 right atrial leads, and 2 coronary sinus leads. Clinical success among the leads approached with the Evolution RL device was 98.1%. Operative mortality was zero. Major complications did not occur. Four minor complications were encountered (all pocket haematomas). No device-related complications were noted. In cases with multiple leads in situ, no wrapping of companion leads was seen. The average number of extraction tools used per lead was 2.4 (2-4) in the Evolution RL cohort.
CONCLUSION: Based on the presented results of our initial experience with the new bidirectional rotational mechanical extraction device, its use is safe and efficient with high success rates in long implanted leads.

Abstract

AIMS: We investigated the safety and efficacy of a new bidirectional rotational mechanical extraction sheath (Evolution RL, Cook Medical, USA).
METHODS AND RESULTS: From April 2013 until September 2014, we performed lead extraction procedures in 71 patients with 112 leads scheduled for extraction. During this time period, we used the new Evolution RL rotational sheath in 40 patients on 52 leads (24 pacemaker leads and 28 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads) scheduled for extraction. The mean lead implant duration in these patients was 100.2 (22-271) months. Forty leads were right ventricular leads, 10 right atrial leads, and 2 coronary sinus leads. Clinical success among the leads approached with the Evolution RL device was 98.1%. Operative mortality was zero. Major complications did not occur. Four minor complications were encountered (all pocket haematomas). No device-related complications were noted. In cases with multiple leads in situ, no wrapping of companion leads was seen. The average number of extraction tools used per lead was 2.4 (2-4) in the Evolution RL cohort.
CONCLUSION: Based on the presented results of our initial experience with the new bidirectional rotational mechanical extraction device, its use is safe and efficient with high success rates in long implanted leads.

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2016
Deposited On:02 Feb 2016 14:52
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 19:57
Publisher:Oxford University Press
ISSN:1099-5129
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv126
PubMed ID:25995394

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations