UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

The Esthetic Effect of Veneered Zirconia Abutments for Single-Tooth Implant Reconstructions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial


Thoma, Daniel S; Brandenberg, Francine; Fehmer, Vincent; Knechtle, Nathalie; Hämmerle, Christoph Hf; Sailer, Irena (2016). The Esthetic Effect of Veneered Zirconia Abutments for Single-Tooth Implant Reconstructions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 18(6):1210-1217.

Abstract

PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to test whether or not veneering of the submucosal part of zirconia abutments can positively influence the esthetic outcome compared with nonveneered zirconia abutments; to evaluate the influence of the mucosal thickness on the esthetic outcomes of the veneered and nonveneered abutments; and to evaluate the thickness of the peri-implant mucosa compared with the thickness of the gingiva of contralateral tooth sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-four single-tooth implants in 44 patients were randomly restored with either cemented (CR) or screw-retained (SR) reconstructions based on white zirconia abutments (CR-W, SR-W) or pink-veneered zirconia abutments (CR-P, SR-P). Esthetic outcome measurements were performed based on a spectrophotometric evaluation of the peri-implant mucosal color. In addition, the thickness of the mucosa was measured. A two-way analysis of variance was conducted to test the effect of veneering (pink vs white) and mucosa thickness (<2 mm vs ≥2 mm) on the calculated color difference ΔE for pooled data of CR and SR reconstructions (p < .05). RESULTS Analyses grouping the sites according to veneering of the abutments and mucosal thickness demonstrated less discoloration for sites with a veneered abutment irrespective of the mucosal thickness: ΔE 4.50 ± 1.93 (<2 mm) and ΔE 6.88 ± 2.45 (≥2 mm); CR-P, SR-P) compared with sites without veneering ΔE 9.72 ± 3.82 (<2 mm; CR-W, SR-W) and ΔE 8.31 ± 2.98 (≥2 mm). The differences between veneered and nonveneered abutments were significant (p = .032). CONCLUSIONS Veneering of zirconia abutments with pink veneering ceramic positively influenced the peri-implant mucosal color.

Abstract

PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to test whether or not veneering of the submucosal part of zirconia abutments can positively influence the esthetic outcome compared with nonveneered zirconia abutments; to evaluate the influence of the mucosal thickness on the esthetic outcomes of the veneered and nonveneered abutments; and to evaluate the thickness of the peri-implant mucosa compared with the thickness of the gingiva of contralateral tooth sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-four single-tooth implants in 44 patients were randomly restored with either cemented (CR) or screw-retained (SR) reconstructions based on white zirconia abutments (CR-W, SR-W) or pink-veneered zirconia abutments (CR-P, SR-P). Esthetic outcome measurements were performed based on a spectrophotometric evaluation of the peri-implant mucosal color. In addition, the thickness of the mucosa was measured. A two-way analysis of variance was conducted to test the effect of veneering (pink vs white) and mucosa thickness (<2 mm vs ≥2 mm) on the calculated color difference ΔE for pooled data of CR and SR reconstructions (p < .05). RESULTS Analyses grouping the sites according to veneering of the abutments and mucosal thickness demonstrated less discoloration for sites with a veneered abutment irrespective of the mucosal thickness: ΔE 4.50 ± 1.93 (<2 mm) and ΔE 6.88 ± 2.45 (≥2 mm); CR-P, SR-P) compared with sites without veneering ΔE 9.72 ± 3.82 (<2 mm; CR-W, SR-W) and ΔE 8.31 ± 2.98 (≥2 mm). The differences between veneered and nonveneered abutments were significant (p = .032). CONCLUSIONS Veneering of zirconia abutments with pink veneering ceramic positively influenced the peri-implant mucosal color.

Citations

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:December 2016
Deposited On:22 Jan 2016 09:27
Last Modified:03 Dec 2016 02:00
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
ISSN:1523-0899
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12388
PubMed ID:26676273

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations