UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Scale and scope matter when explaining varying patterns ofcommunity diversity in riverine metacommunities


Seymour, Mathew; Deiner, Kristy; Altermatt, Florian (2016). Scale and scope matter when explaining varying patterns ofcommunity diversity in riverine metacommunities. Basic and Applied Ecology, 17(2):134-144.

Abstract

Large-scale species and genetic metacommunity patterns are influenced by variation in environmental factors and distancebetween communities, according to previous studies. However, these studies often used different measures to assess patternsof metacommunity diversity, distances between communities and grain sizes at which environmental variables are measured.This hinders interpretations and generalizations of the underlying process that drive metacommunity diversity. We applied asynthetic and multi-analytical approach to identify general factors structuring the diversity of a large riverine metacommunity.Using complementing approaches we analyzed how distance, measured as Euclidean or topological distance, and environmentalfactors, assessed at different grain sizes, influenced different measures of metacommunity diversity (species richness, functionalrichness and phylogenetic diversity) of mayfly, stonefly and caddisfly species in a large river network (river Rhine, Switzerland).We found the amount of explained variation in species diversity was generally unaffected by grain size, but improved with the useof topological distance, compared to Euclidean distance. Variation in functional diversity was best explained by environmentalfactors at small grain sizes and topological distance. Variation in phylogenetic diversity was best explained when environmentalvariables were assessed at larger grain sizes and Euclidean distance was used. Overall, our results indicate that processesstructuring metacommunity diversity may differ at the species, functional or phylogenetic level of the community, as recentlypostulated in the metacommunity–phylogenetics approach. While such differences may hinder comparisons across studiesusing different methodologies, it offers opportunities to disentangle the structuring factors within metacommunities by applyingmultiple analytical approaches to the same dataset.

Abstract

Large-scale species and genetic metacommunity patterns are influenced by variation in environmental factors and distancebetween communities, according to previous studies. However, these studies often used different measures to assess patternsof metacommunity diversity, distances between communities and grain sizes at which environmental variables are measured.This hinders interpretations and generalizations of the underlying process that drive metacommunity diversity. We applied asynthetic and multi-analytical approach to identify general factors structuring the diversity of a large riverine metacommunity.Using complementing approaches we analyzed how distance, measured as Euclidean or topological distance, and environmentalfactors, assessed at different grain sizes, influenced different measures of metacommunity diversity (species richness, functionalrichness and phylogenetic diversity) of mayfly, stonefly and caddisfly species in a large river network (river Rhine, Switzerland).We found the amount of explained variation in species diversity was generally unaffected by grain size, but improved with the useof topological distance, compared to Euclidean distance. Variation in functional diversity was best explained by environmentalfactors at small grain sizes and topological distance. Variation in phylogenetic diversity was best explained when environmentalvariables were assessed at larger grain sizes and Euclidean distance was used. Overall, our results indicate that processesstructuring metacommunity diversity may differ at the species, functional or phylogenetic level of the community, as recentlypostulated in the metacommunity–phylogenetics approach. While such differences may hinder comparisons across studiesusing different methodologies, it offers opportunities to disentangle the structuring factors within metacommunities by applyingmultiple analytical approaches to the same dataset.

Citations

2 citations in Web of Science®
3 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

2 downloads since deposited on 14 Apr 2016
2 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
590 Animals (Zoology)
Uncontrolled Keywords:Macroinvertebrates; Freshwater; Variance partitioning; Phylogenetic; Functional; Metacommunity phylogenetics
Language:English
Date:2016
Deposited On:14 Apr 2016 17:43
Last Modified:31 May 2016 07:50
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1439-1791
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2015.10.007

Download

[img]
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only until 9 November 2017
Size: 925kB
View at publisher
Embargo till: 2017-11-09

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations