Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Maintenance: Tuesday, 5.7.2016, 07:00-08:00

Maintenance work on ZORA and JDB on Tuesday, 5th July, 07h00-08h00. During this time there will be a brief unavailability for about 1 hour. Please be patient.

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-13434

Zilla, P; Human, P; Wolf, M; Lichtenberg, W; Rafiee, N; Bezuidenhout, D; Samodien, N; Schmidt, C; Franz, T (2008). Constrictive external nitinol meshes inhibit vein graft intimal hyperplasia in nonhuman primates. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 136(3):717-725.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
View at publisher


OBJECTIVE: External mesh support of vein grafts has been shown to mitigate the formation of intimal hyperplasia. The aim of the present study was to address the issue of optimal mesh size in a nonhuman primate model that mimics the dimensional mismatch typically encountered between clinical vein grafts and their target arteries. METHODS: The effect of mesh size on intimal hyperplasia and endothelial preservation was assessed in bilateral femoral interposition grafts in Chacma baboons (n(Sigma) = 32/n = 8 per mesh size). No mesh support (group I) was compared with external nitinol meshes at three different sizes: loose fitting (group II), 25% diameter constricting (group III), and 50% diameter constricting (group IV). Mesh sizes were seen not only in isolation but also against the background of anastomotic size mismatch at implantation, expressed as quotient of cross-sectional area of host artery to vein graft (Q(C)). RESULTS: Significant amounts of intimal hyperplasia were found in group I (Q(C) median 0.20; intimal hyperplasia 6 weeks = 1.63 +/- 0.34 mm(2); intimal hyperplasia 12 weeks = 1.73 +/- 0.5 mm(2)) and group II (Q(C) median 0.25; intimal hyperplasia 6 weeks = 1.96 +/- 1.64 mm(2); intimal hyperplasia 12 weeks = 2.88 +/- 1.69 mm(2)). In contrast, group III (Q(C) median 0.45; intimal hyperplasia 6 weeks = 0.08 +/- 0.13 mm(2); intimal hyperplasia 12 weeks = 0.18 +/- 0.32 mm(2)) and IV (Q(C) median 1.16; intimal hyperplasia 6 weeks = 0.02 +/- 0.03 mm(2); intimal hyperplasia 12 weeks = 0.11 +/- 0.10 mm(2)) showed dramatically suppressed intimal hyperplasia (P < .01) at both time points. Endothelial integrity was only preserved in group IV (P < .05). There were no significant differences in vascularization and inflammation in either interlayer or intergroup comparisons. CONCLUSION: By using an animal model that addressed the clinical phenomenon of diameter discrepancy between vein graft and bypassed artery, we could demonstrate that suppression of intimal hyperplasia required constrictive mesh sizes.


28 citations in Web of Science®
35 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™



2 downloads since deposited on 12 Feb 2009
0 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Deposited On:12 Feb 2009 14:04
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 12:59
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.02.068
PubMed ID:18805277

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page