Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Maintenance: Tuesday, 5.7.2016, 07:00-08:00

Maintenance work on ZORA and JDB on Tuesday, 5th July, 07h00-08h00. During this time there will be a brief unavailability for about 1 hour. Please be patient.

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-1461

Lüthy, H; Filser, F; Loeffel, Ol; Schumacher, M; Gauckler, L J; Hämmerle, C H F (2005). Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges. Dental Materials, 21(10):930-937.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
View at publisher


OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the in vitro load bearing capacity of four-unit posterior frameworks made of glass ceramic with lithium-disilicate crystals (E2), of zirconia-reinforced glass-infiltrated alumina (ICZ) and of zirconia stabilized with 3 mol% yttria (CEZ). METHODS: All frameworks mimicked a four-unit posterior situation with 7.3 mm2 interdental cross-sections and possessed exactly the same dimensions. The load bearing capacity was measured on a special bridge test setup with 15 specimens for each of the materials. The data were analyzed with Weibull statistics giving the characteristic load bearing capacity F0 at 63% failure probability and the Weibull modulus m as indicator for the reliability and reproducibility. RESULTS: For the E2 frameworks the average load bearing capacity and the SD was 260 (+/-53) N, the characteristic load F0 282 N and the reliability m = 5.7. For the ICZ frameworks the average load bearing capacity was 470 (+/-101) N, F0 518 N and m = 4.5. CEZ frameworks revealed the highest average load bearing capacity of 706 (+/-123) N, the highest characteristic load bearing capacity F0 = 755 N and the best reliability m = 7.0. SIGNIFICANCE: CEZ frameworks showed the best mechanical properties as demonstrated by the high values of average load bearing capacity, reliability and characteristic load bearing capacity with respect to the other ceramics studied. However, for four-unit posterior CEZ frameworks the connector size of 7.3 mm2 is insufficient to withstand occlusal forces reported in the literature. Four-unit posterior frameworks require a connector size larger than 7.3 mm2.


97 citations in Web of Science®
109 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™



0 downloads since deposited on 11 Feb 2008
0 downloads since 12 months

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Date:1 October 2005
Deposited On:11 Feb 2008 12:23
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 12:18
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.012
PubMed ID:15923031

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page