Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and ArchiveĀ 

Haller, T; Galvin, M; Meroka, P; Alca, J; Alvarez, A (2008). Who gains from community conservation? intended and unintended costs and benefits of participative approaches in Peru and Tanzania. Journal of Environment and Development, 17(2):118-144.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Who are the beneficiaries from participative approaches in conservation? The authors compare two protected areas Amarakaeri Communal Reserve in Peru and Selous Game Reserve in Tanzania and show how in similar institutional settings local interest groups react very differently to the possibility of participation. The difference, however, does not regard economic benefits. In the case of Peru, local groups defining themselves as indigenous peoples see a political gain in participatory conservation, which seems to offer the possibility for securing land rights in their area. In Tanzania, however, local actors oppose participative conservation strategies or passively resist those forced on them because they cause high-economic costs and no political gains. By comparing both cases based on a new institutionalism analysis, the article reveals how intended and unintended costs and benefits can explain different attitudes of local groups to participative conservation.

Item Type:Journal Article, not refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Social Anthropology
DDC:390 Customs, etiquette & folklore
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
Language:English
Date:2008
Deposited On:05 Mar 2009 16:15
Last Modified:23 Nov 2012 17:16
Publisher:Sage Publications
ISSN:1070-4965
Publisher DOI:10.1177/1070496508316853
Citations:Google Scholarā„¢

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page