Haller, T; Galvin, M; Meroka, P; Alca, J; Alvarez, A (2008). Who gains from community conservation? intended and unintended costs and benefits of participative approaches in Peru and Tanzania. Journal of Environment and Development, 17(2):118-144.
Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher
Who are the beneficiaries from participative approaches in conservation? The authors compare two protected areas Amarakaeri Communal Reserve in Peru and Selous Game Reserve in Tanzania and show how in similar institutional settings local interest groups react very differently to the possibility of participation. The difference, however, does not regard economic benefits. In the case of Peru, local groups defining themselves as indigenous peoples see a political gain in participatory conservation, which seems to offer the possibility for securing land rights in their area. In Tanzania, however, local actors oppose participative conservation strategies or passively resist those forced on them because they cause high-economic costs and no political gains. By comparing both cases based on a new institutionalism analysis, the article reveals how intended and unintended costs and benefits can explain different attitudes of local groups to participative conservation.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, not refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||06 Faculty of Arts > Department of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies|
|Dewey Decimal Classification:||790 Sports, games & entertainment
390 Customs, etiquette & folklore
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
|Deposited On:||05 Mar 2009 15:15|
|Last Modified:||05 Jun 2014 09:42|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page