Abstract

This article examines the interdependency between politics, ideology, and narrative fiction. First, I offer a brief survey of important ways in which the notions of ideology and politics have been conceptualized. I then go on to suggest that a Foucaultian notion of discourse is one of the most powerful critical tools for the analysis of ideology and politics, and perhaps the one most suitable for linking the two concepts to the realm of narrative fiction. While I agree that ideology and politics should never be seen as entirely separate domains, I also propose that we must maintain some distinction between them if we want to use the terms productively in a critical analysis of fictional narratives. Consequently, I suggest that the opposition between politics and ideology can be seen as analogous to the utterance-grammar distinction; while politics is concerned with individual, socially and historically localized instance of power struggles, ideology refers to an entire "underlying" system of such moves for power. Building on these theoretical premises, the article concludes with a discussion of hegemonic and/or marginal discourses, hopefully providing the reader with the sense that a clearer distinction between politics and ideology leads to more precise and exciting interpretations of narrative fiction.