Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-18015

Knols, R H; Aufdemkampe, G; de Bruin, E D; Uebelhart, D; Aaronson, N K (2009). Hand-held dynamometry in patients with haematological malignancies: measurement error in the clinical assessment of knee extension strength. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, (10):31.

[img]
Preview
PDF
1MB

View at publisher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hand-held dynamometry is a portable and inexpensive method to quantify muscle strength. To determine if muscle strength has changed, an examiner must know what part of the difference between a patient's pre-treatment and post-treatment measurements is attributable to real change, and what part is due to measurement error. This study aimed to determine the relative and absolute reliability of intra and inter-observer strength measurements with a hand-held dynamometer (HHD). METHODS: Two observers performed maximum voluntary peak torque measurements (MVPT) for isometric knee extension in 24 patients with haematological malignancies. For each patient, the measurements were carried out on the same day. The main outcome measures were the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC +/- 95%CI), the standard error of measurement (SEM), the smallest detectable difference (SDD), the relative values as % of the grand mean of the SEM and SDD, and the limits of agreement for the intra- and inter-observer ;3 repetition average; and the ;highest value of 3 MVPT; knee extension strength measures. RESULTS: The intra-observer ICCs were 0.94 for the average of 3 MVPT (95%CI: 0.86-0.97) and 0.86 for the highest value of 3 MVPT (95%CI: 0.71-0.94). The ICCs for the inter-observer measurements were 0.89 for the average of 3 MVPT (95%CI: 0.75-0.95) and 0.77 for the highest value of 3 MVPT (95%CI: 0.54-0.90). The SEMs for the intra-observer measurements were 6.22 Nm (3.98% of the grand mean (GM) and 9.83 Nm (5.88% of GM). For the inter-observer measurements, the SEMs were 9.65 Nm (6.65% of GM) and 11.41 Nm (6.73% of GM). The SDDs for the generated parameters varied from 17.23 Nm (11.04% of GM) to 27.26 Nm (17.09% of GM) for intra-observer measurements, and 26.76 Nm (16.77% of GM) to 31.62 Nm (18.66% of GM) for inter-observer measurements, with similar results for the limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that there is acceptable relative reliability for evaluating knee strength with a HHD, while the measurement error observed was modest. The HHD may be useful in detecting changes in knee extension strength at the individual patient level.

Citations

11 citations in Web of Science®
15 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

50 downloads since deposited on 27 Mar 2009
18 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Rheumatology Clinic and Institute of Physical Medicine
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2009
Deposited On:27 Mar 2009 10:16
Last Modified:27 Nov 2013 19:20
Publisher:BioMed Central
ISSN:1471-2474
Publisher DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-10-31
PubMed ID:19272149

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page