Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-18138

Bloch, K E; Turk, A J; Maggiorini, M; Hess, T; Merz, T; Bosch, M M; Barthelmes, D; Hefti, U; Pichler, J; Senn, O; Schoch, O D (2009). Effect of ascent protocol on acute mountain sickness and success at Muztagh Ata, 7546 m. High Altitude Medicine and Biology, 10(1):25-32.

[img]PDF - Registered users only
1856Kb
[img]PDF (Akteptiertes Manuskript) - Registered users only
463Kb

Abstract

Bloch, Konrad E., Alexander J. Turk, Marco Maggiorini, Thomas Hess, Tobias Merz, Martina M. Bosch, Daniel Barthelmes, Urs Hefti, Jacqueline Pichler, Oliver Senn, and Otto D. Schoch. Effect of ascent protocol on acute mountain sickness and success at Muztagh Ata, 7546 m. High Alt. Med. Biol. 10:25-32, 2009.-Data on acclimatization during expedition-style climbing to > 5000 m are scant. We evaluated the hypothesis that minor differences in ascent protocol influence acute mountain sickness (AMS) symptoms and mountaineering success in climbers to Muztagh Ata (7546 m), Western China. We performed a randomized, controlled trial during a high altitude medical research expedition to Muztagh Ata. Thirty-four healthy mountaineers (mean age 45 yr, 7 women) were randomized to follow one of two protocols, ascending within 15 or 19 days to the summit of Muztagh Ata at 7546 m, respectively. The main outcome measures, AMS symptom scores and the number of proceeding climbers, were assessed daily. Mean +/- SD AMS-C scores of 16 climbers randomized to slow ascent were 0.06 +/- 0.18, 0.26 +/- 0.08, 0.41 +/- 0.45, 0.53 +/- 0.77 at camps I (5533 m), II (6265 m), III (6865 m), and the summit (7546 m), respectively. Corresponding values in 18 climbers randomized to fast ascent were significantly higher: 0.17 +/- 0.23, 0.43 +/- 0.75, 0.49 +/- 0.36, and 0.69 +/- 0.54 (p < 0.008, vs. slow ascent in regression analysis accounting for weather-related protocol deviation). Climbers randomized to slow ascent were able to ascend according to the protocol without AMS for significantly more days than climbers randomized to fast ascent (p = 0.04, Kaplan-Meier analysis). More climbers randomized to slow ascent were successful in reaching the highest camp at 6865 m without AMS (odds ratio 9.5; 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 89). In climbers ascending to very high altitudes, differences of a few days in acclimatization have a significant impact on symptom severity, the prevalence of AMS, and mountaineering success. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00603122.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Ophthalmology Clinic
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic and Policlinic for Internal Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Integrative Human Physiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Pneumology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of General Practice
DDC:570 Life sciences; biology
610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2009
Deposited On:07 Apr 2009 16:16
Last Modified:27 Nov 2013 17:39
Publisher:Mary Ann Liebert
ISSN:1527-0297
Additional Information:Copyright © 2009, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. publishers
Publisher DOI:10.1089/ham.2008.1043
Official URL:http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/ham.2008.1043
Related URLs:http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ham.2008.1043 (Publisher)
PubMed ID:19326598
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 19
Google Scholar™

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page