Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-18414

Benninger, E; Laschke, M W; Cardell, M; Keel, M; Seifert, Burkhardt; Trentz, O; Menger, M D; Meier, C (2009). Intra-abdominal pressure development after different temporary abdominal closure techniques in a porcine model. Journal of Trauma, 66(4):1118-1124.

[img] PDF - Repository staff only
1MB

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decompressive laparotomy followed by temporary abdominal closure (TAC) is an established prophylaxis and treatment for abdominal compartment syndrome. The herein presented study aimed at the comparison of volume reserve capacity and development of intra-abdominal hypertension after forced primary abdominal closure and different TAC techniques in a porcine model.

METHODS: Eight anesthesized and mechanically ventilated domestic pigs underwent a standardized midline laparotomy. A bag was placed into the abdominal cavity. Before abdominal closure, the bag was prefilled with 3,000 mL water to simulate increased intra-abdominal volume. The intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was then increased in 2 mm Hg steps up to 30 mm Hg by adding volume (volume reserve capacity) to the intra-abdominal bag. Volume reserve capacity with the corresponding IAP were analyzed and compared for primary abdominal closure, bag silo closure, a zipper system, and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) with different negative pressures (-50, -100, and -150 mm Hg). Hemodynamic and pulmonary parameters were monitored throughout the experiment.

RESULTS: Volume reserve capacity was the highest for bag silo closure followed by the zipper system and VAC with primary abdominal closure providing the least volume reserve capacity in the whole IAP range. Of interest, VAC -50 mm Hg resulted in a lower volume reserve capacity when compared with VAC -100 and -150 mm Hg. Pulmonary and hemodynamic parameters demonstrated no significant differences between primary abdominal closure and the evaluated TAC techniques at all IAP levels.

CONCLUSIONS: The present experimental in vivo study indicates that bag silo closure and zipper systems may be favorable TAC techniques after decompressive laparotomy. In contrast, the VAC techniques resulted in lower volume reserve capacity and therefore may bear an increased risk for recurrent intra-abdominal hypertension in the initial phase after decompressive laparotomy.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Epidemology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI)
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:April 2009
Deposited On:24 Apr 2009 10:04
Last Modified:18 Jul 2014 16:23
Publisher:Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins
ISSN:0022-5282
Publisher DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181820d94
Related URLs:http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/spa/ovidweb.cgi?&S=OEGHFPCHGBDDOAGPMCGLEDOKANKLAA00&Abstract=S.sh.15.16.18|24|1
PubMed ID:19359923
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 8
Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 2

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page