Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-18461
Ettlin, D A; Brügger, M; Keller, T; Luechinger, R; Jäncke, L; Palla, S; Barlow, A; Gallo, L M; Lutz, K (2009). Interindividual differences in the perception of dental stimulation and related brain activity. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 117(1):27-33.
- Registered users only
For identical diagnoses in the trigeminal innervation territory, individual differences have been clinically observed among the symptoms reported, such as dysesthesia and pain. Different subjective perceptions of unpleasantness and pain intensity may have different cortical substrates. The aim of this study was to identify brain areas in which activation depends on the subjective perception (intensity and unpleasantness) of electric dental stimulation. Electrical stimuli of increasing intensity were applied to maxillary canines in 14 healthy volunteers. Ratings for stimulus intensity and unpleasantness perceived across the stimulation session were reported postscan on 11-point numerical scales. The rating values were then included as covariates in the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) group analysis. Interindividual differences of intensity ratings were reflected in differential activity of the following brain areas: superior parietal lobule, superior temporal gyrus/anterior insula, inferior and middle temporal gyrus, lingual gyrus, anterior cingulate, and caudate nucleus. Differences related to unpleasantness ratings were reflected in the lingual gyrus. In conclusion, differences of perceived intensity between individuals are reflected in the differential activity of a set of brain areas distinct from those regions, reflecting rating differences of unpleasantness.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology|
04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Engineering
610 Medicine & health
|Deposited On:||24 Apr 2009 15:30|
|Last Modified:||27 Nov 2013 17:09|
|Citations:||Web of Science®. Times Cited: 18|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 17
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page