Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-18967
Materstvedt, L J; Bosshard, G (2009). Deep and continuous palliative sedation (terminal sedation): clinical-ethical and philosophical aspects. Lancet Oncology, 10(6):622-627.
- Registered users only
View at publisher
Terminal sedation continues to fuel debate. When confronted with a patient for whom terminal sedation is considered a possible treatment option, decision making can be difficult. In this paper we focus on the clinical-ethical issues, with an aim to provide clinicians with ways of framing the issue from an ethical point of view. In addition to the clinical-ethical issues, terminal sedation touches upon interesting and complex questions of an essentially philosophical nature. What it means to be a "person" is one such question, and is a topic that is relevant to clinical, daily practice. Accordingly, in the latter part of this paper we draw briefly on selected philosophical positions to elucidate this question. A doctor's belief of what it means to be a "person" might well affect their actions. For example, if a doctor believes terminal sedation involves the destruction of the person, they might not be willing to proceed with it.
120 downloads since deposited on 08 Jun 2009
21 downloads since 12 months
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||01 Faculty of Theology > Center for Ethics
04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine
610 Medicine & health
|Deposited On:||08 Jun 2009 08:51|
|Last Modified:||23 Nov 2012 15:54|
|Additional Information:||Elsevier – Full text article|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page