Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-19028
Jucker, Andreas H (2009). Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8):1611-1635.
- Registered users only
View at publisher
In this paper I discuss pragmatic research methods and their suitability to different research questions in speech act research. Clark and Bangerter [Clark, H.H., Bangerter, A., 2004. Changing ideas about reference. In: Noveck, I.A., Sperber, D. (Eds.), Experimental Pragmatics (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition). Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, pp. 25–49] use the terms "armchair", "field" and "laboratory" to refer to linguistic methods based on intuited data, natural data and elicited data, respectively.
In this paper I will not argue for the superiority of one of these methods over the other two. I take the view that it depends on the specific research question whether one or the other of these three approaches can yield useful insights. I will illustrate these considerations with
research efforts in the field of compliment research. Compliments are particularly interesting because they pose a politeness dilemma for the recipient, who either has to violate the maxim of agreement or the maxim of modesty. They have been investigated from very different perspectives (pattern of the compliment, the demographics of the complimenter and the compliment recipient, compliment
responses and so on) and with a range of different methods (including the notebook method, the corpus method and discourse completion tests). I will review this literature and discuss the suitability of individual methods in relation to individual research questions.
9 downloads since deposited on 12 Jun 2009
5 downloads since 12 months
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||06 Faculty of Arts > English Department|
|Dewey Decimal Classification:||820 English & Old English literatures|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Speech acts; Research methods; Compliments; Politeness|
|Deposited On:||12 Jun 2009 12:28|
|Last Modified:||09 May 2016 03:05|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page