UZH-Logo

PET/CT of the abdomen: optimizing the patient breathing pattern


Goerres, G W; Burger, C; Schwitter, M R; Heidelberg, T N H; Seifert, Burkhardt; von Schulthess, G K (2002). PET/CT of the abdomen: optimizing the patient breathing pattern. European Radiology, 13(4):734-739.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the respiration position, which is optimal for co-registration of abdominal CT images, and the corresponding positron emission tomography (PET) scan in a new combined PET/CT system. Ten patients (5 men, 5 women; age 57.7+/-15.3 years, age range 34-80 years) underwent imaging for tumor staging on a combined PET/CT scanner (Discovery LS, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis.). The PET emission images were acquired during normal shallow breathing and during CT scanning the patients performed four different breathing tasks: free breathing (FB); maximum inspiration (MaxInsp); maximum expiration (MaxExp); and normal expiration (NormExp). NormExp was defined as the respiratory level that was reached when the patient first inhaled and then exhaled without forcing expiration, and then held the breath in this position. Movements of the spleen, liver, left and right kidney, and the bladder were measured by using the promontory of the sacrum as a reference point and measuring the distance from this point to the abdominal organs in the PET and CT images by two independent observers. Statistical comparison of the measured distances between the CT scans and the PET scan were made using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance served for the assessment of intraobserver and interobserver agreement. There was no significant difference between NormExp and FB indicating that both respiration protocols are suitable for PET/CT image co-registration of abdominal studies. In contrast, the MaxExp and MaxInsp protocol are not suitable. The NormExp and FB respiration protocol are both suitable for the co-registration of abdominal PET/CT studies. In most patients the mismatch of abdominal organs will be lower than the resolution of the final co-registered PET/CT image.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the respiration position, which is optimal for co-registration of abdominal CT images, and the corresponding positron emission tomography (PET) scan in a new combined PET/CT system. Ten patients (5 men, 5 women; age 57.7+/-15.3 years, age range 34-80 years) underwent imaging for tumor staging on a combined PET/CT scanner (Discovery LS, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis.). The PET emission images were acquired during normal shallow breathing and during CT scanning the patients performed four different breathing tasks: free breathing (FB); maximum inspiration (MaxInsp); maximum expiration (MaxExp); and normal expiration (NormExp). NormExp was defined as the respiratory level that was reached when the patient first inhaled and then exhaled without forcing expiration, and then held the breath in this position. Movements of the spleen, liver, left and right kidney, and the bladder were measured by using the promontory of the sacrum as a reference point and measuring the distance from this point to the abdominal organs in the PET and CT images by two independent observers. Statistical comparison of the measured distances between the CT scans and the PET scan were made using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. Repeated-measures analysis of variance served for the assessment of intraobserver and interobserver agreement. There was no significant difference between NormExp and FB indicating that both respiration protocols are suitable for PET/CT image co-registration of abdominal studies. In contrast, the MaxExp and MaxInsp protocol are not suitable. The NormExp and FB respiration protocol are both suitable for the co-registration of abdominal PET/CT studies. In most patients the mismatch of abdominal organs will be lower than the resolution of the final co-registered PET/CT image.

Citations

76 citations in Web of Science®
95 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 29 Jun 2009
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI)
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Date:22 June 2002
Deposited On:29 Jun 2009 09:34
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 13:16
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0938-7994
Additional Information:The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
Publisher DOI:10.1007/s00330-002-1548-2
PubMed ID:12664111
Permanent URL: http://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-19450

Download

[img]
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 1MB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations