Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-19528
Kummer, M; Gygax, D; Jackson, M; Bettschart-Wolfensberger, R; Fürst, A (2009). Results and complications of a novel technique for primary castration with an inguinal approach in horses. Equine Veterinary Journal, 41(6):547-551.
- Registered users only
Reasons for performing study: Complications associated with equine castration can have medical and financial consequences. This retrospective study investigated a novel method of castration via an inguinal approach in mature stallions and compared the incidence of complications with other methods.
Hypothesis: Castration via an inguinal approach has a low complication rate at the site of surgery compared with other castration techniques.
Methods: Mature stallions (n = 238) were castrated under general anaesthesia in dorsal recumbency using an inguinal approach. The vaginal process was incised, the spermatic cord ligated twice and the testis removed. After suturing, the vaginal process and one or 2 layers of fascia, the subcutis and cutis were closed in a simple continuous pattern.
Results: Five of 238 (2.1%) horses had post operative haemorrhage and a haematoma in the scrotal region, which required additional treatment. All horses made a full recovery. Five of 238 (2.1%) of the horses had a post operative respiratory infection, which resolved with antibiotic therapy. Sixteen of 238 (8.8%) had transient signs of colic shortly after surgery.
Conclusion: This technique of castration with an inguinal approach had a low incidence of complications at the site of surgery compared with other methods. An inguinal approach and leaving the vaginal tunic in situ may cause less soft tissue trauma than a scrotal approach.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Equine Department > Equine Clinic|
|DDC:||570 Life sciences; biology|
|Deposited On:||03 Jul 2009 11:58|
|Last Modified:||27 Nov 2013 18:53|
|Citations:||Web of Science®. Times Cited: 8|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 9
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page