Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-2297
Von Burg, S; Ferrari, J; Müller, C B; Vorburger, C (2008). Genetic variation and covariation of susceptibility to parasitoids in the aphid Myzus persicae: no evidence for trade-offs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1638):1089-1094.
PDF - Registered users only
Parasitoids are an important mortality factor for insects. Susceptibility to parasitoids should thus be under strong negative selection. Nevertheless, ample genetic variation for susceptibility to parasitoids is commonly observed in natural populations, suggesting that trade-offs may constrain the evolution of reduced susceptibility. This can be studied by assessing genetic variation for susceptibility and its covariation with other components of fitness. In a set of 17 clones of the peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae, for which good estimates of heritable variation for life-history traits were available, we found significant clonal variation for susceptibility to two of their common parasitoids: Aphidius colemani and Diaeretiella rapae. One clone, the only one harbouring a facultative endosymbiotic bacterium, Regiella insecticola, was entirely resistant to both parasitoids. Susceptibilities to the two parasitoids exhibited a positive genetic correlation close to unity, implying a general mechanism of defence. However, the susceptibility to parasitoids was uncorrelated to the clones' fecundity or rate of increase, providing no evidence for costs of the ability to resist parasitoids.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies|
|DDC:||570 Life sciences; biology|
590 Animals (Zoology)
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||costs of resistance; endosymbionts; genetic correlations; aphids; parasitoids; Regiella insecticola|
|Deposited On:||28 Mar 2008 10:12|
|Last Modified:||28 Nov 2013 02:04|
|Publisher:||Royal Society of London|
|Citations:||Web of Science®. Times Cited: 31|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 32
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page