Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-23204

Widmer, A; Kummer, M; Wehrli Eser, M; Fürst, A (2009). Comparison of the clinical efficacy of cefquinome with the combination of penicillin G and gentamicin in equine patients. Equine Veterinary Education, 21(8):430-435.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
1MB

Abstract

This prospective, randomised, nonblinded study compared the clinical efficacy of cefquinome to that of a combination of penicillin and gentamicin. Patients (374 horses and 13 donkeys) at the equine hospital of the Vetsuisse-Faculty of Zurich, presented from February-October 2007, were divided into prophylactic and therapeutic treatment groups. Equids from these groups were randomly treated either with cefquinome or with the combination of sodium penicillin and gentamicin.

There was no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups for prophylactic indications. In the therapeutic group, cefquinome showed better efficacy, as demonstrated by fewer complications of wound healing and fewer treatment failures with subsequent change to another antibiotic. Side effects were very rare in both treatment groups. Cefquinome can be used with safety and efficacy in equids. Cefquinome had greater efficacy than the combination of penicillin and gentamicin in the therapeutic group. However, there was no difference between the 2 antibiotic treatments in the prophylactic group. In order to minimise the development of resistance, cefquinome should therefore not be used for routine prophylactic treatment.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Equine Department > Equine Clinic
DDC:570 Life sciences; biology
630 Agriculture
Language:English
Date:August 2009
Deposited On:21 Oct 2009 08:08
Last Modified:27 Nov 2013 20:21
Publisher:Equine Veterinary Journal
ISSN:0957-7734
Publisher DOI:10.2746/095777309X453137
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 5
Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 5

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page