Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-23223
Lewandowsky, S; Oberauer, Klaus; Brown, G (2009). Response to Barrouillet and Camos: Interference or decay in working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4):146-147.
- Registered users only
View at publisher
Barrouillet and Camos raise three objections to our conclusion that short-term forgetting is caused by interference rather than decay . They suggest (i) that interference models are ‘vague’, (ii) that considering forgetting as a function of delay is questionable and (iii) that the timebased resource-sharing (TBRS) model is not challenged by the data we cited. We believe that these objections do not withstand scrutiny.
1 download since deposited on 21 Oct 2009
0 downloads since 12 months
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology|
|Dewey Decimal Classification:||150 Psychology|
|Deposited On:||21 Oct 2009 10:23|
|Last Modified:||05 Apr 2016 13:30|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page