Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-23223

Lewandowsky, S; Oberauer, K; Brown, G (2009). Response to Barrouillet and Camos: Interference or decay in working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4):146-147.

[img]PDF - Registered users only
1023Kb

Abstract

Barrouillet and Camos raise three objections to our conclusion that short-term forgetting is caused by interference rather than decay [1]. They suggest (i) that interference models are ‘vague’, (ii) that considering forgetting as a function of delay is questionable and (iii) that the timebased resource-sharing (TBRS) model is not challenged by the data we cited. We believe that these objections do not withstand scrutiny.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
DDC:150 Psychology
Language:English
Date:March 2009
Deposited On:21 Oct 2009 12:23
Last Modified:28 Nov 2013 00:57
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1364-6613
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.003
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 4
Google Scholar™

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page