Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-24214

Loetz, F (2008). How far could free religious thinking go?: the case of Johann Rudolf Werdmüller, Zurich 1658. Journal of Religious History, 32(4):409-421.

Accepted Version


In 1658, Johann(es) Rudolf Werdmüller, a renowned Zurich general and diplomat,
was accused of blasphemy. As it referred to essential religious matters, the accusation
had a considerable public impact. The court files of the case provide evidence of wider
battles over the desirability and nature of religious tolerance. Instead of narrating a case
story this analysis suggests a different approach to the history of religion. The sources
are not taken as documents expressing a discursive system of philosophical points
of view and their appearance in religious polemics. Rather, the court files stand for specific
speech acts, i.e. verbal performances in the linguistic sense. Thus, Werdmüller’s
example is taken to demonstrate that those considered to be blasphemers in the
era of confessionalisation did not simply express religious scepticism in the form of
“discourses,” nor did they rebel against authority figures or resort to forms of magic.
Rather, they provoked their society, discussed religious matters, entertained their
audience and competed wittingly with those interested in religious issues. In conclusion,
it is proposed that the history of religion should not be confined to a history
of ideas and religious doctrines but should integrate linguistic approaches.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of History
DDC:900 History
Deposited On:24 Nov 2009 11:51
Last Modified:23 Nov 2012 15:46
Additional Information:The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com
Publisher DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9809.2008.00722.x
Official URL:http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0022-4227
Citations:Google Scholar™

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page