Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-25614

Stoter, J; Burghardt, D; Duchêne, C; Bakker, N; Blok, C; Pla, M; Regnauld, N; Touya, G; Schmid, S (2009). Methodology for evaluating automated map generalization in commercial software. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(5):311-324.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
3MB

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology developed for a study to evaluate the state of the art of automated map generalization in commercial software without applying any customization. The objectives of this study are to learn more about generic and specific requirements for automated map generalization, to show possibilities and limitations of commercial generalization software, and to identify areas for further research. The methodology had to consider all types of heterogeneity to guarantee independent testing and evaluation of available generalization solutions. The paper presents the two main steps of the methodology. The first step is the analysis of map requirements for automated generalization, which consisted of sourcing representative test cases, defining map specifications in generalization constraints, harmonizing constraints across the test cases, and analyzing the types of constraints that were defined. The second step of the methodology is the evaluation of generalized outputs. In this step, three evaluation methods were integrated to balance between human and machine evaluation and to expose possible inconsistencies. In the discussion the applied methodology is evaluated and areas for further research are identified.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography
DDC:910 Geography & travel
Language:English
Date:2009
Deposited On:14 Jan 2010 15:56
Last Modified:23 Nov 2012 12:27
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0198-9715
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.06.002
Citations:Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 20

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page