Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Gifford, R; Scannell, L; Kormos, C; Biel, A; Boncu, S; Kaiser, F G (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1):1-12.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The personal assessments of the current and expected future state of the environment by 3130 community
respondents in 18 nations were investigated at the local, national, and global spatial levels. These
assessments were compared to a ranking of each country’s environmental quality by an expert panel.
Temporal pessimism (‘‘things will get worse’’) was found in the assessments at all three spatial levels.
Spatial optimism bias (‘‘things are better here than there’’) was found in the assessments of current
environmental conditions in 15 of 18 countries, but not in the assessments of the future. All countries
except one exhibited temporal pessimism, but significant differences between them were common.
Evaluations of current environmental conditions also differed by country. Citizens’ assessments of current
conditions, and the degree of comparative optimism, were strongly correlated with the expert
panel’s assessments of national environmental quality. Aside from the value of understanding global
trends in environmental assessments, the results have important implications for environmental policy
and risk management strategies.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
DDC:150 Psychology
Language:English
Date:March 2009
Deposited On:13 Jan 2010 14:57
Last Modified:23 Nov 2012 12:30
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0272-4944
Additional Information:Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
Free access at:Related URL. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
Related URLs:http://web.uvic.ca/psyc/gifford/pdf/Optimism%20Study%20Proof.pdf
Citations:Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 37

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page