Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-27114

Paqué, F; Ganahl, D; Peters, O A (2009). Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. Journal of Endodontics, 35(7):1056-1059.

[img]
Preview
Accepted Version
PDF
1MB

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous micro-computed tomography analyses of root canal preparation provided data that were usually averaged over canal length. The aim of this study was to compare preparation effects on apical root canal geometry. METHODS: Sixty extracted maxillary molars (180 canals) used in prior studies were reevaluated for analyses of the apical 4 mm. Teeth were scanned by using micro-computed tomography before and after canal shaping with FlexMaster, GT-Rotary, Lightspeed, ProFile, ProTaper, instruments or nickel-titanium K-files for hand instrumentation. Apical preparation was to a size #40 in mesiobuccal and distobuccal and #45 in palatal canals except for GT (#20) and ProTaper (#25 in mesiobuccal and distobuccal and #30 in palatal canals, respectively). Data for canal volume changes, the structure model index (quantifying canal cross sections), and untreated surface area were contrasted by using analysis of variance and Scheffé tests. RESULTS: Mean mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal canal volumes increased after preparation (P < .05), but differences were noted for preparation techniques. GT rendered the smallest (0.20 +/- 0.14 mm(3)); K-files and ProFile showed the largest volume increases (0.51 +/- 0.20 mm(3) and 0.45 +/- 021 mm(3), P < .05). All canals were slightly rounder in the apical 4 mm after preparation indicated by nonsignificant increases in structure model index. Untreated areas ranged from 4%-100% and were larger in mesiobuccal and palatal canals than in distobuccal ones. Preparation with GT left significantly larger untreated areas in all canal types (P < .05); among root canal types, distobuccal canals had the least amounts of untreated surface areas. CONCLUSIONS: Apical canal geometry was affected differently by 6 preparation techniques; preparations with GT instruments to an apical size #20 left more canal surface untouched, which might affect the ability to disinfect root canals in maxillary molars.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:July 2009
Deposited On:01 Feb 2010 15:32
Last Modified:27 Nov 2013 20:13
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0099-2399
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.020
PubMed ID:19567334
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 47
Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 53

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page