Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-27328

Distler, O; Eich, W; Dokoupilova, E; Dvorak, Z; Fleck, M; Gaubitz, M; Hechler, M; Jansen, J P; Krause, A; Bendszus, M; Pache, L; Reiter, R; Müller-Ladner, U (2010). Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of terguride in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: Results of a twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 62(1):291-300.

[img]
Preview
Accepted Version
PDF
1330Kb
[img]PDF - Registered users only
1131Kb

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of terguride, a partial dopamine agonist, in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). METHODS: In a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, 99 patients were randomized at a ratio of 2 to 1 to receive terguride or placebo. Over 21 days, the dosage was titrated to a maximum daily dose of 3 mg of terguride or placebo, and this fixed dosage was continued over 9 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the intensity of pain (100-mm visual analog scale). Secondary efficacy variables included the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) score, the tender point score (TPS), and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) score. During the study, patients were evaluated for the presence of cervical spine stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: No significant differences in the change in pain intensity, FIQ score, TPS, or HDS score between baseline and 12 weeks were observed in the terguride group as compared with the placebo group. Cervical spine stenosis was detected in 22% of the patients. Only patients with cervical spine stenosis responded to terguride treatment. FIQ scores improved significantly (per-protocol analysis), and pain intensity, the TPS score, and the HDS score showed a trend toward improvement in the terguride group as compared with the placebo group. Terguride treatment was safe. Only those adverse events already known to be side effects of terguride were observed. Premature termination of the study in patients receiving terguride (26%) occurred predominantly during up-titration and in the absence of comedication for treatment of nausea. CONCLUSION: Terguride treatment did not improve pain, the FIQ score, the TPS, or the HDS score in the total study population. However, a subgroup of patients with cervical spine stenosis seemed to benefit from terguride treatment.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Rheumatology Clinic and Institute of Physical Medicine
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2010
Deposited On:13 Jan 2010 15:12
Last Modified:28 Nov 2013 00:17
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:0004-3591
Additional Information:The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com
Publisher DOI:10.1002/art.25062
PubMed ID:20039417
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 9
Google Scholar™

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page