Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-29665
Osterloh, Margit; Frost, Jetta (2009). Bad for practice – good for practice from economic imperialism to multidisciplinary mapping. Journal of International Business Ethics, 2(1):36-45.
There is a growing debate about economics not only being bad for practice but also destroying good management practice. The focus of this debate has been on the negative influences of wrong assumptions in theory building which become a self-fulfilling prophecy. We analyze why standard economics indeed can be bad for managerial and political practice. Aside from wrong assumptions, economic imperialism is another important factor. We argue that psychological economics is better for practice than standard economics, but is still not good for practice, as long as it uses an imperialistic approach. We propose a different research strategy, which we call multidisciplinary mapping. It not only bridges between different disciplinary approaches but also between the knowledge of scholars and practitioners. It is good for practice as well as for theory building.
50 downloads since deposited on 08 Feb 2010
3 downloads since 12 months
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||03 Faculty of Economics > Department of Business Administration|
|Dewey Decimal Classification:||330 Economics|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||economics, psychological economics, multidisciplinary mapping, maps, management practice, theory|
|Deposited On:||08 Feb 2010 11:16|
|Last Modified:||23 Nov 2012 14:46|
|Publisher:||The American Scholars Press|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page