Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-29674

Osterloh, Margit; Frey, Bruno S (2009). Are more and better indicators the solution? Comment to William Starbuck. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(2):225-227.

[img]Accepted Version
PDF
1MB

Abstract

We discuss Starbuck’s proposal to improve decision processes in scholarly evaluation. While we agree that more variety is needed in evaluation committees, we suggest to enlist scholars from other research fields rather than people from outside academia. We disagree with the proposal that reliable indicators of research effectiveness will improve research. We argue that evaluating research with
even better and more reliable indicators would lead to worse results than what is observed today. Attention would be deviated from the content of research, and intrinsic motivation, which is essential for good research, would be crowded out. We propose that evaluations that are based on indicators need to be pushed back. After a careful selection process, researchers need to be given the opportunity to pursue the research they consider to be fruitful.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, further contribution
Communities & Collections:03 Faculty of Economics > Department of Business Administration
DDC:330 Economics
Language:English
Date:June 2009
Deposited On:11 Feb 2010 01:43
Last Modified:27 Nov 2013 23:05
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0956-5221
Additional Information:Special Topic Forum on Faddishness in Academic Work
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2009.03.003
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 4
Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 5

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page