Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-30877
Desjacques, V; Seljak, U; Iliev, I T (2009). Scale-dependent bias induced by local non-Gaussianity: a comparison to N-body simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 396(1):85-96.
We investigate the effect of primordial non-Gaussianity of the local fNL type on the auto- and cross-power spectra of dark matter haloes using simulations of the Λ cold dark matter cosmology. We perform a series of large N-body simulations of both positive and negative fNL, spanning the range between 10 and 100. Theoretical models predict a scale-dependent bias correction Δb(k, fNL) that depends on the linear halo bias b(M) . We measure the power spectra for a range of halo mass and redshifts covering the relevant range of existing galaxy and quasar populations. We show that auto- and cross-correlation analyses of bias are consistent with each other. We find that for low wavenumbers with k < 0.03 h Mpc−1 the theory and the simulations agree well with each other for biased haloes with b(M) > 1.5 . We show that a scale-independent bias correction improves the comparison between theory and simulations on smaller scales, where the scale-dependent effect rapidly becomes negligible. The current limits on fNL from Slosar et al. come mostly from very large scales k < 0.01 h Mpc−1 and, therefore, remain valid. For the halo samples with b(M) < 1.5 − 2 , we find that the scale-dependent bias from non-Gaussianity actually exceeds the theoretical predictions. Our results are consistent with the bias correction scaling linearly with fNL.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||07 Faculty of Science > Institute for Computational Science|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||gravitation; galaxies: haloes; cosmology: theory; dark matter|
|Deposited On:||26 Feb 2010 13:16|
|Last Modified:||28 Nov 2013 00:29|
|Funders:||Swiss National Foundation [200021-116696/1]|
|Additional Information:||The attached file is a preprint (accepted version) of an article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com|
|Citations:||Web of Science®. Times Cited: 80|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 81
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page