UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Utility indices in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome


Schmidlin, M; Fritsch, K; Matthews, F; Thurnheer, R; Senn, O; Bloch, K E (2010). Utility indices in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Respiration, 79(3):200-208.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Utility indices are used in cost-effectiveness analyses as a measure of quality of life reflecting the patient's preference for a given health state on a scale anchored at 0 (corresponding to death) to 1 (perfect health). It is uncertain which utility instruments are most suitable for application in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA). OBJECTIVES: To compare utility indices obtained in OSA patients by various instruments. Methods: In 66 untreated OSA patients (median Epworth score 12, apnea/hypopnea index, AHI, 57/h), five different utility instruments were employed. In 34 OSA patients, changes in utility after 4 months of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were retrieved from published SF-36 data. RESULTS: In 66 OSA patients, median (quartiles) utility indices were: standard gamble 0.97 (0.89; 0.99); time trade-off 0.94 (0.81; 0.99); EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D) 0.92 (0.83; 1.00); Euro-thermometer visual analog scale 0.80 (0.70; 0.90); SF-36 questionnaire (SF-6D) 0.75 (0.69; 0.85; p < 0.05 SF-6D and Euro-thermometer utility vs. other indices). Different utility indices were poorly correlated among each other and with AHI and Epworth scores. SF-6D utility after 4 months of CPAP had changed by 0.04 (0.02; 0.12, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Utility indices measured by different instruments vary largely and some indices reflect the impaired quality of life in OSA poorly. Interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses should account for the utility instrument used.

BACKGROUND: Utility indices are used in cost-effectiveness analyses as a measure of quality of life reflecting the patient's preference for a given health state on a scale anchored at 0 (corresponding to death) to 1 (perfect health). It is uncertain which utility instruments are most suitable for application in patients with the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA). OBJECTIVES: To compare utility indices obtained in OSA patients by various instruments. Methods: In 66 untreated OSA patients (median Epworth score 12, apnea/hypopnea index, AHI, 57/h), five different utility instruments were employed. In 34 OSA patients, changes in utility after 4 months of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were retrieved from published SF-36 data. RESULTS: In 66 OSA patients, median (quartiles) utility indices were: standard gamble 0.97 (0.89; 0.99); time trade-off 0.94 (0.81; 0.99); EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D) 0.92 (0.83; 1.00); Euro-thermometer visual analog scale 0.80 (0.70; 0.90); SF-36 questionnaire (SF-6D) 0.75 (0.69; 0.85; p < 0.05 SF-6D and Euro-thermometer utility vs. other indices). Different utility indices were poorly correlated among each other and with AHI and Epworth scores. SF-6D utility after 4 months of CPAP had changed by 0.04 (0.02; 0.12, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Utility indices measured by different instruments vary largely and some indices reflect the impaired quality of life in OSA poorly. Interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses should account for the utility instrument used.

Citations

14 citations in Web of Science®
13 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

115 downloads since deposited on 10 Mar 2010
34 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Pneumology
04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Integrative Human Physiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of General Practice
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:January 2010
Deposited On:10 Mar 2010 09:11
Last Modified:01 Jul 2016 07:29
Publisher:Karger
ISSN:0025-7931
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1159/000222094
PubMed ID:19478475
Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-31358

Download

[img]
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 290kB
View at publisher
[img]
Preview
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 237kB

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations