Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-32751

Mannion, A F; Helbling, D; Pulkovski, N; Sprott, H (2009). Spinal segmental stabilisation exercises for chronic low back pain: programme adherence and its influence on clinical outcome. European Spine Journal, 18(12):1881-1891.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
211kB

View at publisher

Abstract

Exercise rehabilitation is one of the few evidence-
based treatments for chronic non-specific low back
pain (cLBP), but individual success is notoriously variable
and may depend on the patient’s adherence to the prescribed
exercise regime. This prospective study examined
factors associated with adherence and the relationship
between adherence and outcome after a programme of
physiotherapeutic spine stabilisation exercises. A total of
32/37 patients with cLBP completed the study (mean age,
44.0 (SD = 12.3) years; 11/32 (34%) male). Adherence to
the 9-week programme was documented as: percent
attendance at therapy, percent adherence to daily home
exercises (patient diary) and percent commitment to rehabilitation(Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale
(SIRAS)). The average of these three measures formed a
multidimensional adherence index (MAI). Psychological
disturbance, fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophising, exercise self-efficacy and health locus of control were measured by questionnaire; disability in everyday activities
was scored with the Roland–Morris disability scale and
back pain intensity with a 0–10 graphic rating scale.
Overall, adherence to therapy was very good (average MAI
score, 85%; median (IQR), 89 (15)%). The only psychological/
beliefs variable showing a unique significant association
with MAI was exercise self-efficacy (Rho = 0.36,
P = 0.045). Pain intensity and self-rated disability
decreased significantly after therapy (each P\0.01).
Adherence to home exercises showed a moderate, positive
correlation with the reduction in average pain (Rho = 0.54,
P = 0.003) and disability (Rho = 0.38, P = 0.036);
higher MAI scores were associated with greater reductions
in average pain (Rho = 0.48, P = 0.008) and a (n.s.)
tendency for greater reductions in disability (Rho = 0.32,
P = 0.07) Neither attendance at therapy nor SIRAS were
significantly related to any of the outcomes. The benefits of rehabilitation depended to a large extent on the patient’s exercise behaviour outside of the formal physiotherapy sessions. Hence, more effort should be invested in finding ways to improve patients’ motivation to take responsibility for the success of their own therapy, perhaps by increasing exercise self-efficacy. Whether the "adherence–outcome" interaction was mediated by improvements in function related to the specific exercises, or by a more "global" effect of the programme, remains to be examined.

Citations

12 citations in Web of Science®
12 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 22 Mar 2010
0 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Rheumatology Clinic and Institute of Physical Medicine
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2009
Deposited On:22 Mar 2010 12:07
Last Modified:14 Dec 2013 16:55
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0940-6719
Publisher DOI:10.1007/s00586-009-1093-7
PubMed ID:19609785

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page