UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Framing the European Integration Process: Country-, Party- or Issue-Specific?


Helbling, M; Hoeglinger, D; Wüest, B (2008). Framing the European Integration Process: Country-, Party- or Issue-Specific? In: ECPR Graduate Conference 2008, Barcelona, 24 August 2008 - 27 August 2008.

Abstract

This paper proposes to study how the European integration process is framed. Such an analysis helps us better understand how the European Union is perceived and which arguments are mobilized to support or oppose it. We will test a series of hypotheses that have so far only been tested in individual countries. Drawing on Habermas’ typology of pragmatic-, identity- and value-related arguments we provide sophisticated frame categorizations to capture the complex structure of argumentation and to go beyond a simple dichotomization of economic and cul-tural frames. Relaying on a large media dataset for the period from 2004 to 2006 in six Western European countries we not only look at how political actors argue, but also whether framing strategies vary across countries and issues that are debated. We will come to the conclusion that the way the European Union is perceived de-pends a lot on the actors that are involved in the debate and the issues that are at stake.

This paper proposes to study how the European integration process is framed. Such an analysis helps us better understand how the European Union is perceived and which arguments are mobilized to support or oppose it. We will test a series of hypotheses that have so far only been tested in individual countries. Drawing on Habermas’ typology of pragmatic-, identity- and value-related arguments we provide sophisticated frame categorizations to capture the complex structure of argumentation and to go beyond a simple dichotomization of economic and cul-tural frames. Relaying on a large media dataset for the period from 2004 to 2006 in six Western European countries we not only look at how political actors argue, but also whether framing strategies vary across countries and issues that are debated. We will come to the conclusion that the way the European Union is perceived de-pends a lot on the actors that are involved in the debate and the issues that are at stake.

Downloads

119 downloads since deposited on 01 Sep 2008
19 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper), not refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science
Dewey Decimal Classification:320 Political science
Event End Date:27 August 2008
Deposited On:01 Sep 2008 14:03
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 12:27
Official URL:http://www.ecpr.org.uk/conference/
Related URLs:http://www.ecpr.org.uk/conference/barcelona_review/
Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-3460

Download

[img]
Preview
Filetype: PDF (Tables)
Size: 102kB
[img]
Preview
Filetype: PDF (Paper)
Size: 1MB

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations