Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-34816

König, C J; Klehe, U C; Berchtold, M; Kleinmann, Martin (2010). Reasons for being selective when choosing personnel selection procedure. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(1):17-27.

Accepted Version
View at publisher


The scientist-practitioner gap in personnel selection is large. Thus, it is important to gain a better understanding of the reasons that make organizations use or not use certain selection procedures. Based on institutional theory, we predicted that six variables should determine the use of selection procedures: the procedures' diffusion in the field, legal problems associated with the procedures, applicant reactions to the procedures, their usefulness for organizational self-promotion, their predictive validity, and the costs involved. To test these predictions, 506 HR professionals from the German-speaking part of Switzerland filled out an online survey on the selection procedures used in their organizations. Respondents also evaluated five procedures (semi-structured interviews, ability tests, personality tests, assessment centers, and graphology) on the six predictor variables. Multilevel logistic regression was used to analyze the data. The results revealed that the highest odd ratios belonged to the factors applicant reactions, costs, and diffusion. Lower (but significant) odds ratios belonged to the factors predictive validity, organizational self-promotion, and perceived legality.


27 citations in Web of Science®
36 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™



299 downloads since deposited on 06 Jul 2010
33 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Date:March 2010
Deposited On:06 Jul 2010 12:49
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:11
Additional Information:The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com
Publisher DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00485.x
Official URL:http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123282026/abstract

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page