Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-35055
Murphy, T; Weber, R (2010). Confucianizing Socrates and Socratizing Confucius – On Comparing Analects 13:18 and Euthyphro. Philosophy East and West, 60(2):187-206.
View at publisher
An apparently quite specific question that was addressed by both Confucius and Socrates has attracted much attention in Sino-Hellenistic comparative philosophy. Their respective responses to the question of how a son should respond if his father commits a crime are found in Confucius' Analects 13:18 and in Plato's Euthyphro. This essay assesses three comparative analyses of these responses with particular reference to their underlying assertions of commonality, that is, the assumptions or presuppositions of commonality that serve to justify the comparative exercise in the first instance. The authors suggest that two of the analyses assert commonality between their two responses from a Confucian standpoint, while the third constructs commonality from a Socratic standpoint. The authors argue that the response of Confucius focuses specifically on the issue of xiao (filial piety) in the concrete situation presented to him, whereas Socrates uses the issue to investigate the different question known as the "Euthyphro dilemma." Some brief conclusions are drawn regarding comparative philosophical analysis in general and about comparing the responses of Confucius and Socrates in these passages in particular.
168 downloads since deposited on 16 Aug 2010
32 downloads since 12 months
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||08 University Research Priority Programs > Asia and Europe|
|Dewey Decimal Classification:||950 History of Asia
180 Ancient, medieval & eastern philosophy
|Deposited On:||16 Aug 2010 12:06|
|Last Modified:||05 Apr 2016 14:12|
|Publisher:||University of Hawaii Press|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page