UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Feeding practice in captive wild ruminants : pecularities in the nutrition of browsers/concentrate selectors and intermediate feeders. A review


Clauss, Marcus; Kienzle, Ellen; Hatt, Jean-Michel (2003). Feeding practice in captive wild ruminants : pecularities in the nutrition of browsers/concentrate selectors and intermediate feeders. A review. In: Fidgett, A L; Clauss, Marcus; Ganslosser, U; Hatt, Jean-Michel; Nijboer, J. Zoo Animal Nutrition Vol. II. Fürth: Filander, 27-52.

Abstract

We present a review on the feeding practice, the nutritional pathology and the documented nutritional peculiarities of zoo ruminants. The difference in chemical composition between browse and grass historically led to the conclusion that browsers need a diet lower in fibre and higher in protein than grazing ruminants. The term “concentrate selectors”, coined to describe browsing ruminants, additionally focused the attention on the chemical nature of a browser’s diet assumed high in easily fermentable, soluble nutrients; the choice of the term “concentrate” therefore has been critized in the scientific literature (e.g. Owen-Smith 1996). In comparative nutritional surveys, browsing ruminants in zoos tend to consume less fibre, more protein and more nitrogen-free extracts than grazers. While this could be interpreted as a reflection of their nutritional needs, this feeding type displays, in comparative pathological surveys, a higher incidence of acidotic changes in the ruminal mucosa, indicating that this group does not ingest sufficient amounts of fibrous material. Additionally, data from controlled bilance trials does not support the notion that browsing ruminants have higher protein requirements. We suspect that the lesser fibre intake in browsers is due to their reluctance to ingest hay, which is usually offered ad libitum. Reluctance to ingest hay and digestive problems after hay ingestion have been reported for different captive browsing ruminant species and is reflected by a similar reluctance of free-ranging browsers to ingest grasses. There is reason to believe that it is the physical rather than the chemical difference between grass and browse that affected the evolution of different ruminant feeding types. Attention within the zoo community should focus on providing browsers with a fibre source that corresponds to the physical characteristics of their natural forage.

We present a review on the feeding practice, the nutritional pathology and the documented nutritional peculiarities of zoo ruminants. The difference in chemical composition between browse and grass historically led to the conclusion that browsers need a diet lower in fibre and higher in protein than grazing ruminants. The term “concentrate selectors”, coined to describe browsing ruminants, additionally focused the attention on the chemical nature of a browser’s diet assumed high in easily fermentable, soluble nutrients; the choice of the term “concentrate” therefore has been critized in the scientific literature (e.g. Owen-Smith 1996). In comparative nutritional surveys, browsing ruminants in zoos tend to consume less fibre, more protein and more nitrogen-free extracts than grazers. While this could be interpreted as a reflection of their nutritional needs, this feeding type displays, in comparative pathological surveys, a higher incidence of acidotic changes in the ruminal mucosa, indicating that this group does not ingest sufficient amounts of fibrous material. Additionally, data from controlled bilance trials does not support the notion that browsing ruminants have higher protein requirements. We suspect that the lesser fibre intake in browsers is due to their reluctance to ingest hay, which is usually offered ad libitum. Reluctance to ingest hay and digestive problems after hay ingestion have been reported for different captive browsing ruminant species and is reflected by a similar reluctance of free-ranging browsers to ingest grasses. There is reason to believe that it is the physical rather than the chemical difference between grass and browse that affected the evolution of different ruminant feeding types. Attention within the zoo community should focus on providing browsers with a fibre source that corresponds to the physical characteristics of their natural forage.

Downloads

344 downloads since deposited on 27 Mar 2009
49 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Book Section, refereed, further contribution
Communities & Collections:05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Department of Small Animals
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
630 Agriculture
Language:English
Date:2003
Deposited On:27 Mar 2009 14:46
Last Modified:07 Sep 2016 08:42
Publisher:Filander
Series Name:Zoological Library
ISBN:978-3-930831-51-7
Related URLs:http://www.filander.de/ (Publisher)
Permanent URL: http://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-3515

Download

[img]
Content: Published Version
Language: English
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 2MB

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations