Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-35583

Haerle, S K; Huber, G F; Hany, T F; Ahmad, N; Schmid, D T (2010). Is there a correlation between (18)F-FDG-PET standardized uptake value, T-classification, histological grading and the anatomic subsites in newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck? European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 267(10):1635-40.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
1MB

View at publisher

Abstract

(18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET)/CT imaging of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) renders the possibility to study metabolic tumor activity by measuring FDG-uptake expressed as maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)). A correlation between SUV(max) and several factors including T-classification, histological tumor differentiation or different anatomic subsites is of potential interest in HNSCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate how metabolic tumor activity derived from FDG-PET correlates with prognostic clinical and pathological parameters including these factors. 262 patients with HNSCC undergoing PET/CT for initial staging were assessed separately for a potential correlation between SUV(max) and T-classification, histological grading, and anatomical subsites of the primary tumor. Nonparametric testing showed a significant correlation between SUV(max) and T-classification (P < 0.001). On the contrary, no statistically significant correlation was found between SUV(max) and histological tumor grading. Furthermore, no statistical significant correlation between the different anatomical subsites and SUV(max) were found. There was no significant correlation of SUV(max) and tumor grading after adjustment for T-stage and anatomical localization of the tumor, neither. Conclusion: Metabolic tumor activity correlates with T-stage of HNSCC. However, histological tumor grading does not correlate with SUV(max). The role of primary tumor SUV(max) as a predictor of outcome or survival remains unclear. Clinicians should therefore exercise caution in attributing any clinical importance to SUV(max) obtained from a single PET/CT exam.

Citations

11 citations in Web of Science®
10 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

3 downloads since deposited on 25 Aug 2010
0 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Nuclear Medicine
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:August 2010
Deposited On:25 Aug 2010 13:13
Last Modified:27 Nov 2013 19:35
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0937-4477
Publisher DOI:10.1007/s00405-010-1348-2
Official URL:http://www.springerlink.com/content/0108278xm8h3775k/fulltext.pdf
PubMed ID:20680640

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page