Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-36216
Bosshart, M; Stover, J F; Stocker, R; Asmis, L M; Feige, J; Neff, T A; Schuepbach, R A; Cottini, S R; Béchir, M (2010). Two different hematocrit detection methods: Different methods, different results? BMC Research Notes, 3:65.
BACKGROUND: Less is known about the influence of hematocrit detection methodology on transfusion triggers. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare two different hematocrit-assessing methods. In a total of 50 critically ill patients hematocrit was analyzed using (1) blood gas analyzer (ABLflex 800) and (2) the central laboratory method (ADVIA(R) 2120) and compared. FINDINGS: Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measurements showed a good correlation with a bias of +1.39% and 2 SD of +/- 3.12%. The 24%-hematocrit-group showed a correlation of r2 = 0.87. With a kappa of 0.56, 22.7% of the cases would have been transfused differently. In the-28%-hematocrit group with a similar correlation (r2 = 0.8) and a kappa of 0.58, 21% of the cases would have been transfused differently. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a good agreement between the two methods used to determine hematocrit in clinical routine, the calculated difference of 1.4% might substantially influence transfusion triggers depending on the employed method.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Division of Surgical Intensive Care Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Hematology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Anesthesiology
|DDC:||610 Medicine & health|
|Deposited On:||15 Nov 2010 13:29|
|Last Modified:||03 Dec 2012 16:32|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 1
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page