Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-36242
Fritz, J; Hummel, J; Kienzle, E; Streich, W J; Clauss, M (2010). To chew or not to chew: fecal particle size in herbivorous reptiles and mammals. Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology, 313A(9):579-586.
- Registered users only
A major difference between reptile and mammalian herbivores is that the former do not masticate their food. Actually, food particle size reduction by chewing is usually considered one of the adaptations facilitating the higher metabolic rates of mammals. However, quantitative comparisons of ingesta particle size between the clades have, to our knowledge, not been performed so far. We measured mean fecal particle size (MPS) in 79 captive individuals of 14 reptile herbivore species (tortoises, lizards, and Corucia zebrata) by wet sieving and compared the results with a mammalian dataset. MPS increased with body mass in both clades, but at a significantly higher level in reptiles. Limited evidence in free-ranging and captive individuals of Testudo hermanni indicates that in reptiles, the ability to crop food and food particle size significantly influence fecal particle size. The opportunistic observation of a drastic particle size difference between stomach and intestinal contents corroborates findings that in reptiles, in contrast to terrestrial mammals, significant ingesta particle size reduction does occur in the gastrointestinal tract, most likely owing to microbial action during very long ingesta retention. Whether behavioral adaptations to controlling ingesta particle size, such as deliberate small bite sizes, are adaptive strategies in reptiles remains to be investigated.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Department of Small Animals > Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife|
|DDC:||570 Life sciences; biology
|Deposited On:||03 Dec 2010 13:05|
|Last Modified:||28 Nov 2013 01:21|
|Additional Information:||The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com|
|Citations:||Web of Science®. Times Cited: 9|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 8
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page