Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Maintenance: Tuesday, 5.7.2016, 07:00-08:00

Maintenance work on ZORA and JDB on Tuesday, 5th July, 07h00-08h00. During this time there will be a brief unavailability for about 1 hour. Please be patient.

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-36291

Rid (Schulz-Baldes), A; Wendler, D (2010). Risk-benefit assessment in medical research--critical review and open questions. Law, Probability and Risk, 9(3-4):151-177.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
View at publisher


One of the central ethical requirements for medical research is that the risks to individual research participants should not be excessive. Despite widespread endorsement of this requirement, how it should be implemented remains controversial. This paper critically reviews the four existing approaches to evaluating the risks and benefits of medical research. It argues that the ‘net risks test’ is superior to ‘component analysis’, the ‘agreement principle’, and the ‘integrative approach’ and ends by highlighting several important questions that remain to be addressed.




2 downloads since deposited on 19 Nov 2010
0 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, not refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:01 Faculty of Theology > Center for Ethics
04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine
Dewey Decimal Classification:170 Ethics
610 Medicine & health
Deposited On:19 Nov 2010 16:47
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:16
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Publisher DOI:10.1093/lpr/mgq006

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page