Quick Search:

is currently disabled due to reindexing of the ZORA database. Please use Advanced Search.
uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-36291

Rid (Schulz-Baldes), A; Wendler, D (2010). Risk-benefit assessment in medical research--critical review and open questions. Law, Probability and Risk, 9(3-4):151-177.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
148kB

Abstract

One of the central ethical requirements for medical research is that the risks to individual research participants should not be excessive. Despite widespread endorsement of this requirement, how it should be implemented remains controversial. This paper critically reviews the four existing approaches to evaluating the risks and benefits of medical research. It argues that the ‘net risks test’ is superior to ‘component analysis’, the ‘agreement principle’, and the ‘integrative approach’ and ends by highlighting several important questions that remain to be addressed.

Item Type:Journal Article, not refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:01 Faculty of Theology > Center for Ethics
04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Ethics
DDC:170 Ethics
610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2010
Deposited On:19 Nov 2010 16:47
Last Modified:26 Nov 2012 07:08
Publisher:Oxford University Press
ISSN:1470-8396
Publisher DOI:10.1093/lpr/mgq006
Citations:Google Scholar™

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page