Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-38427

Albertini, F; Hug, E B; Lomax, A J (2010). The influence of the optimization starting conditions on the robustness of intensity-modulated proton therapy plans. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 55(10):2863-2878.

[img]PDF - Registered users only
2059Kb

Abstract

In this paper the influence of varying the starting conditions on intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans has been studied. In particular IMPT plans have been optimized based on four different starting conditions of initial beamlet fluences: (a) all beamlets with an initial constant weight, delivering a gradient from the proximal to the distal edge of the target (forward wedge approach); (b) beamlet weights reduced from the distal to the proximal aspect of the target such as to deliver a flat 'spread-out-Bragg-peak' (SOBP approach); (c) beamlet weights calculated to deliver a gradient from the distal (maximal dose) to the proximal edge (inverse wedge); (d) beamlet weights set universally to zero except the most distal one, for each given lateral direction (i.e. distal-edge-tracking, DET). An analysis of robustness to range errors has been performed by recalculating plans, assuming a systematic 3% error in CT values. Results showed that IMPT plans optimized with the forward wedge approach were very sensitive to range errors, since organs-at-risk (OAR) were spared by patching single-field lateral and distal fall-offs, the last ones being strongly sensitive to range errors. In addition a plan robust to range errors can be achieved by starting the optimization process in the case of low-dose constraints to OAR, with the initial flat SOBP approach, and with either the DET or the inverse wedge approaches, in the case of stringent dose-volume constraints to OAR. 'Starting condition-based optimization' as proposed here can therefore provide a tool to transparently 'steer' the optimization outcome to solutions more robust to uncertainties.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Radiation Oncology
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2010
Deposited On:17 Jan 2011 10:59
Last Modified:01 Dec 2013 09:20
Publisher:Institute of Physics Publishing
ISSN:0031-9155
Publisher DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/55/10/005
PubMed ID:20427853
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 16
Google Scholar™

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page