UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Geographie sei, was Geographen tun: ein Blick hinter den Organisationsplan einer Disziplin


Glückler, J; Goeke, P (2009). Geographie sei, was Geographen tun: ein Blick hinter den Organisationsplan einer Disziplin. Berichte zur deutschen Landeskunde, 83(3):261-280.

Abstract

This paper presents an empirical analysis of the disciplinary architecture as being constructed by the research activities of its academics. We assert that the research fields in geography represent knowledge places, in which knowledge is continuously being created and refuted and that geographers’ activities in different research fields build the foundation of knowledge transfer within geography. Based on these assumptions this paper provides an analysis of a so far unknown picture of the internal knowledge structure of the discipline. Applying the method of social network analysis to the self-descriptions of academic geographers in the German association of geographers (VGDH) we typify four roles to the research fields in geography: legitimate giants, specialists, integrators and a residual category. The result is a picture of geography, which differs markedly from familiar normative organization charts and offers new insights about the architecture of knowledge in academic geography. We hope to inspire alternative reflections on the conception of geography as an academic discipline.

This paper presents an empirical analysis of the disciplinary architecture as being constructed by the research activities of its academics. We assert that the research fields in geography represent knowledge places, in which knowledge is continuously being created and refuted and that geographers’ activities in different research fields build the foundation of knowledge transfer within geography. Based on these assumptions this paper provides an analysis of a so far unknown picture of the internal knowledge structure of the discipline. Applying the method of social network analysis to the self-descriptions of academic geographers in the German association of geographers (VGDH) we typify four roles to the research fields in geography: legitimate giants, specialists, integrators and a residual category. The result is a picture of geography, which differs markedly from familiar normative organization charts and offers new insights about the architecture of knowledge in academic geography. We hope to inspire alternative reflections on the conception of geography as an academic discipline.

Citations

Downloads

135 downloads since deposited on 03 Jan 2011
32 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, not refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography
Dewey Decimal Classification:910 Geography & travel
Language:German
Date:2009
Deposited On:03 Jan 2011 17:02
Last Modified:14 Sep 2016 13:44
Publisher:Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde
ISSN:0005-9099
Official URL:http://www.ifl-leipzig.com/477.0.html
Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-39640

Download

[img]
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 1MB

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations