Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-39948
Birbaum, K; Brogioli, R; Schellenberg, M; Martinoia, E; Stark, W J; Günther, D; Limbach, L K (2010). No evidence for cerium dioxide nanoparticle translocation in maize plants. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(22):8718-8723.
The rapidly increasing production of engineered nanoparticles has raised questions regarding their environmental impact and their mobility to overcome biological important barriers. Nanoparticles were found to cross different mammalian barriers, which is summarized under the term translocation. The present work investigates the uptake and translocation of cerium dioxide nanoparticles into maize plants as one of the major agricultural crops. Nanoparticles were exposed either as aerosol or as suspension. Our study demonstrates that 50 μg of cerium/g of leaves was either adsorbed or incorporated into maize leaves. This amount could not be removed by a washing step and did not depend on closed or open stomata investigated under dark and light exposure conditions. However, no translocation into newly grown leaves was found when cultivating the maize plants after airborne particle exposure. The use of inductively coupled mass spectrometer allowed detection limits of less than 1 ng of cerium/g of leaf. Exposure of plants to well-characterized nanoparticle suspensions in the irrigation water resulted also in no detectable translocation. These findings may indicate that the biological barriers of plants are more resistant against nanoparticle translocation than mammalian barriers.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Plant Biology|
|DDC:||580 Plants (Botany)|
|Deposited On:||25 Jan 2011 15:48|
|Last Modified:||27 Nov 2013 23:36|
|Publisher:||American Chemical Society|
|Additional Information:||This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Environmental Science & Technology, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher.|
|Citations:||Web of Science®. Times Cited: 47|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 51
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page