UZH-Logo

Methane production in relation to body mass of ruminants and equids


Franz, R; Soliva, C R; Kreuzer, M; Steuer, P; Hummel, J; Clauss, M (2010). Methane production in relation to body mass of ruminants and equids. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 12:727-738.

Abstract

Background: Mammalian herbivores produce methane during digestion.
Questions: Do ruminants (such as bovids) produce more methane during digestion than do equids (non-ruminants)? What are the effects of allometric scaling of methane production when different species feed on similar diets?
Methods: From the literature, we collected a set of data on methane production (litres ·day−1) of ruminants (body mass 26–610 kg) and equids (208–850 kg) fed only roughage. To these data we added our own experimental results from three sheep (Ovis orientalis aries, 94 ± 4 kg) and three mini Shetland ponies (Equus ferus caballus, 97 ± 6 kg). We gave these six animals ad libitum access to the same batch of grass hay. We measured their food intake and methane production (using respiratory chambers), and calculated gut fill and food digestibility.
Results: Daily dry matter intake and dry matter digestibility were 39 ± 10 g ·kg−0.75 day−1 and 48 ± 2% in sheep and 72 ± 16 g ·kg−0.75 day−1 and 41 ± 3% in ponies, respectively; the calculated dry matter gut fill was 2.0 ± 0.5% of body mass in sheep and 1.9 ± 0.4% in ponies. Methane production was higher in sheep (30.3 ± 3.0 litres ·day−1) than in ponies (13.4 ± 4.6 litres ·day−1), representing 6.7 ± 1.7% and 1.5 ± 0.2% of gross energy intake, respectively. The data set revealed a linear increase of methane production with body mass (i.e. M1.0) in equids and ruminants. However, a ruminant produces 3.6 times as much methane as does an equid of comparable body mass.
Conclusions: Because energy and food intake scale allometrically with body mass (M0.75), our results mean that energetic losses due to methane production (as a proportion of overall energy intake) increase with increasing body mass. The magnitude of the losses is enough to limit the maximum size of a ruminant’s body, but not that of an equid.

Background: Mammalian herbivores produce methane during digestion.
Questions: Do ruminants (such as bovids) produce more methane during digestion than do equids (non-ruminants)? What are the effects of allometric scaling of methane production when different species feed on similar diets?
Methods: From the literature, we collected a set of data on methane production (litres ·day−1) of ruminants (body mass 26–610 kg) and equids (208–850 kg) fed only roughage. To these data we added our own experimental results from three sheep (Ovis orientalis aries, 94 ± 4 kg) and three mini Shetland ponies (Equus ferus caballus, 97 ± 6 kg). We gave these six animals ad libitum access to the same batch of grass hay. We measured their food intake and methane production (using respiratory chambers), and calculated gut fill and food digestibility.
Results: Daily dry matter intake and dry matter digestibility were 39 ± 10 g ·kg−0.75 day−1 and 48 ± 2% in sheep and 72 ± 16 g ·kg−0.75 day−1 and 41 ± 3% in ponies, respectively; the calculated dry matter gut fill was 2.0 ± 0.5% of body mass in sheep and 1.9 ± 0.4% in ponies. Methane production was higher in sheep (30.3 ± 3.0 litres ·day−1) than in ponies (13.4 ± 4.6 litres ·day−1), representing 6.7 ± 1.7% and 1.5 ± 0.2% of gross energy intake, respectively. The data set revealed a linear increase of methane production with body mass (i.e. M1.0) in equids and ruminants. However, a ruminant produces 3.6 times as much methane as does an equid of comparable body mass.
Conclusions: Because energy and food intake scale allometrically with body mass (M0.75), our results mean that energetic losses due to methane production (as a proportion of overall energy intake) increase with increasing body mass. The magnitude of the losses is enough to limit the maximum size of a ruminant’s body, but not that of an equid.

Citations

11 citations in Web of Science®
13 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Downloads

360 downloads since deposited on 07 Jan 2011
66 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Department of Small Animals
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
630 Agriculture
Language:English
Date:2010
Deposited On:07 Jan 2011 16:06
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:31
Publisher:Evolutionary Ecology Ltd
ISSN:1522-0613
Permanent URL: http://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-41217

Download

[img]
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 1MB
[img]
Preview
Filetype: PDF
Size: 1MB

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations