Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-42151
Stadelmann, M; Roberts, T J; Huq, S (2010). Baseline for trust: defining ‘new and additional’ climate funding. IIED Briefing Papers:1-4.
Climate finance is becoming a dark curve on the road from Copenhagen to Cancún. Poorer nations fear that richer ones will fulfil the US$30 billion ‘fast-start’ climate finance promises made in the non-binding Copenhagen Accord by relabelling or diverting basic development aid, or by simply delivering on past climate finance pledges. The problem is simple: contributor countries are operating with no clear baseline against which their promise of ‘new and additional’ funding can be counted – and they do not accept the baselines put forth by developing countries. A viable solution for the short term is to use projections of business-as-usual development assistance as baselines. The longer-term benchmark could be the provision of truly ‘new’ funds from new funding sources. Substantial up-front negotiations may be required, but seizing this opportunity to define baselines will build confidence on both sides and create predictability for future finance.
20 downloads since deposited on 08 Mar 2011
9 downloads since 12 months
|Item Type:||Journal Article, not refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science|
|Dewey Decimal Classification:||320 Political science|
|Deposited On:||08 Mar 2011 14:45|
|Last Modified:||05 Apr 2016 14:34|
|Publisher:||International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page