UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Shared decision making in medicine: The influence of situational treatment factors


Müller-Engelmann, M; Keller, H; Donner-Banzhoff, N; Krones, T (2011). Shared decision making in medicine: The influence of situational treatment factors. Patient Education and Counseling, 82(2):240-246.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although shared decision making (SDM) has become increasingly important in bioethical discussions and clinical practice, it is not clear in which treatment situations SDM is suitable. We address this question by investigating social norms on the appropriateness of SDM in different situations. METHODS: We conducted qualitative expert interviews with patients, general practitioners, and health administration and research professionals. RESULTS: SDM was considered to be most important in severe illness and chronic condition. Furthermore, SDM was indicated to be required if there is more than one therapeutic option, especially if it is not clear which option is best. Interviewees classified end-of-life decisions and decisions about prevention as those that primarily should be made by informed patients. On the other hand a paternalistic decision was considered most appropriate in emergency situations and when the patient does not want to participate in decision making. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that multiple situational factors and their interactions must be considered regarding the scope of SDM in medical consultation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Research addressing this question will help physicians adjust their consultation style and allow implementations of SDM and decision aids to be tailored more appropriately to complex treatment situations.

OBJECTIVE: Although shared decision making (SDM) has become increasingly important in bioethical discussions and clinical practice, it is not clear in which treatment situations SDM is suitable. We address this question by investigating social norms on the appropriateness of SDM in different situations. METHODS: We conducted qualitative expert interviews with patients, general practitioners, and health administration and research professionals. RESULTS: SDM was considered to be most important in severe illness and chronic condition. Furthermore, SDM was indicated to be required if there is more than one therapeutic option, especially if it is not clear which option is best. Interviewees classified end-of-life decisions and decisions about prevention as those that primarily should be made by informed patients. On the other hand a paternalistic decision was considered most appropriate in emergency situations and when the patient does not want to participate in decision making. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that multiple situational factors and their interactions must be considered regarding the scope of SDM in medical consultation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Research addressing this question will help physicians adjust their consultation style and allow implementations of SDM and decision aids to be tailored more appropriately to complex treatment situations.

Citations

16 citations in Web of Science®
20 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

5 downloads since deposited on 05 Mar 2011
1 download since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:01 Faculty of Theology > Center for Ethics
04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine
Dewey Decimal Classification:170 Ethics
610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2011
Deposited On:05 Mar 2011 14:41
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:37
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0738-3991
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.028
PubMed ID:20542403
Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-42940

Download

[img]
Filetype: PDF (Verlags-PDF) - Registered users only
Size: 161kB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations