Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-42944

Hirsch, O; Keller, H; Albohn-Kühne, C; Krones, T; Donner-Banzhoff, N (2010). Satisfaction of patients and primary care physicians with shared decision making. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 33(3):321-342.

[img] PDF (Verlags-PDF) - Registered users only
1MB

Abstract

Satisfaction with treatment is regarded as an important outcome measure, but its suitability has not been thoroughly investigated in the context of shared decision making (SDM). The authors evaluated whether both patients' and physicians' satisfaction ratings differ between an intervention group and a control group within a structured tool for cardiovascular prevention (ARRIBA-Herz). In a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, controlled trial, 44 family physicians in the intervention group consecutively recruited 550 patients whereas 47 physicians in the control group included 582 patients. Main findings were high satisfaction ratings independent of group allocation in patients and physicians. Significant differences had only negligible effect sizes. Compared to global satisfaction ratings, the effects of the shared decision-making process are better measured by a more concrete approach representing different steps of this process. Further research should refine behaviorally oriented questionnaires that measure SDM and a version for physicians should also be created.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:01 Faculty of Theology > Center for Ethics
04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine
DDC:170 Ethics
610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2010
Deposited On:30 Jan 2011 17:56
Last Modified:27 Nov 2013 20:31
Publisher:Sage Publications
ISSN:0163-2787
Publisher DOI:10.1177/0163278710376662
Related URLs:http://ehp.sagepub.com/content/33/3.toc (Publisher)
PubMed ID:20801975
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 6
Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 8

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page