UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Handshaking with implementation proposals: negotiating requirements understanding


Fricker, S; Gorschek, T; Byman, C; Schmidle, A (2010). Handshaking with implementation proposals: negotiating requirements understanding. IEEE Software, 27:72-80.

Abstract

A bidirectional process for agreeing on product requirements proves effective in overcoming misunderstandings that arise in the traditional handoff of requirements specifications to development teams.

A bidirectional process for agreeing on product requirements proves effective in overcoming misunderstandings that arise in the traditional handoff of requirements specifications to development teams.

Citations

25 citations in Web of Science®
36 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

2 downloads since deposited on 19 Feb 2011
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:03 Faculty of Economics > Department of Informatics
Dewey Decimal Classification:000 Computer science, knowledge & systems
Date:2010
Deposited On:19 Feb 2011 11:02
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:38
Publisher:IEEE
ISSN:0740-7459
Additional Information:© 2010 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2010.44
Other Identification Number:1613
Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-43242

Download

[img]
Filetype: PDF (Publisher version) - Registered users only
Size: 1MB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations