Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-45310
Utting, J F; Kozerke, S; Schnitker, R; Niendorf, T (2010). Comparison of k-t SENSE/k-t BLAST with conventional SENSE applied to BOLD fMRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 32(1):235-241.
- Registered users only
PURPOSE: To compare k-t BLAST (broad-use linear-acquisition speedup technique)/k-t SENSE (sensitivity encoding) with conventional SENSE applied to a simple fMRI paradigm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed at 3 T using a displaced ultra-fast low-angle refocused echo (UFLARE) pulse sequence with a visual stimulus in a block paradigm. Conventional SENSE and k-t BLAST/k-t SENSE data were acquired. Also, k-t BLAST/k-t SENSE was simulated at different undersampling factors from fully sampled data after removal of lines of k-space data. Analysis was performed using SPM5.
RESULTS: Sensitivity to the BOLD response in k-t BLAST/k-t SENSE was comparable with that of SENSE in images acquired at an undersampling factor of 2.3. Simulated k-t BLAST/k-t SENSE yielded reliable detection of activation-induced BOLD contrast at undersampling factors of 5 or less. Sensitivity increased significantly when training data were included in k-space before Fourier transformation (known as "plug-in").
CONCLUSION: k-t BLAST/k-t SENSE performs at least as well as conventional SENSE for BOLD fMRI at a modest undersampling factor. Results suggest that sufficient sensitivity to BOLD contrast may be achievable at higher undersampling factors with k-t BLAST/k-t SENSE than with conventional parallel imaging approaches, offering particular advantages at the highest magnetic field strengths.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Engineering|
610 Medicine & health
|Deposited On:||14 Feb 2011 07:59|
|Last Modified:||03 Dec 2013 07:29|
|Citations:||Web of Science®. Times Cited: 4|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 4
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page