Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Maintenance: Tuesday, 5.7.2016, 07:00-08:00

Maintenance work on ZORA and JDB on Tuesday, 5th July, 07h00-08h00. During this time there will be a brief unavailability for about 1 hour. Please be patient.

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-4544

Melchers, K G; Shanks, D R; Lachnit, H (2008). Stimulus coding in human associative learning: flexible representations of parts and wholes. Behavioural Processes, 77(3):413-427.

[img] PDF (Original publication) - Registered users only
View at publisher


An enduring theme for theories of associative learning is the problem of explaining how configural discriminations—ones in which the significance of combinations of cues is inconsistent with the significance of the individual cues themselves—are learned. One approach has been to assume that configurations are the basic representational form on which associative processes operate, another has tried in contrast to retain elementalism. We review evidence that human learning is representationally flexible in a way that challenges both configural and elemental theories. We describe research showing that task demands, prior experience, instructions, and stimulus properties all influence whether a particular problem is solved configurally or elementally. Lines of possible future theory development are discussed.


48 citations in Web of Science®
49 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™



2 downloads since deposited on 28 Nov 2008
0 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Date:1 March 2008
Deposited On:28 Nov 2008 12:12
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 12:30
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2007.09.013

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page