Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-45496

Epelman, M; Daneman, A; Kellenberger, C J; Aziz, A; Konen, O; Moineddin, R; Whyte, H; Blaser, S (2010). Neonatal encephalopathy: a prospective comparison of head US and MRI. Pediatric Radiology, 40(10):1640-1650.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
1MB

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Head US, the cornerstone neuroimaging modality in neonates, is believed to be less sensitive than MRI for detecting hypoxic ischemic injury (HII). Most reports comparing these modalities are retrospective and have a long interval between the exams.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively characterize the range of abnormalities found in US examinations performed within 2 h of brain MRI in encephalopathic neonates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 76 consecutive exams met our inclusion criteria. Diagnostic performance of the US images was prospectively compared with MRI.

RESULTS: MRI was considered positive for HII in 53 neonates. Of the remaining 23, MRI was negative for HII in 9, showed white matter abnormalities unrelated to HII in 8, and was inconclusive in 6. Of the 70 neonates with conclusive examinations, the US exam was regarded as positive in 67. Diagnostic accuracy of US was 95.7%.

CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that US should still be regarded as a screening test in neonates. US is more sensitive for the detection of injury than previously reported, and more attention should be paid to proper US technique. MRI shows disease more extensively and should be accomplished as early as possible.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Children's Hospital Zurich > Medical Clinic
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Date:2010
Deposited On:11 Feb 2011 15:34
Last Modified:27 Nov 2013 18:32
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0301-0449
Publisher DOI:10.1007/s00247-010-1634-6
PubMed ID:20411255
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 13
Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 16

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page