UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Motivation to learn science and cognitive style


Zeyer, A (2010). Motivation to learn science and cognitive style. Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(2):123-130.

Abstract

This article investigates the relation between cognitive style and motivation to learn science. The concept of cognitive style proposes the interplay of two core psychological dimensions, empathizing and systemizing. The cognitive style is defined as the interplay between the two abilities. We used the so-called EQ score (empathy quotient) and the SQ score (systemizing quotient) to measure the empathizing and the systemizing dimension
respectively. The motivation to learn science was measured by the so–called Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ), which reflects the operationalization of five basic motivational constructs. We investigated a sample of 44 high school students, 17 to 19 year-old, stratified by their sex and by their science/non-science orientation. Our data showed a highly significant and fairly strong correlation between the motivation to learn science and the systemizing quotient. However, different from what we expected, we found no correlation between the motivation to learn science and the empathy quotient.
We also found no difference in the motivation to learn science neither for sex nor for science-orientation. The implications of these findings are discussed, especially in the light of school science and research of science education.

This article investigates the relation between cognitive style and motivation to learn science. The concept of cognitive style proposes the interplay of two core psychological dimensions, empathizing and systemizing. The cognitive style is defined as the interplay between the two abilities. We used the so-called EQ score (empathy quotient) and the SQ score (systemizing quotient) to measure the empathizing and the systemizing dimension
respectively. The motivation to learn science was measured by the so–called Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ), which reflects the operationalization of five basic motivational constructs. We investigated a sample of 44 high school students, 17 to 19 year-old, stratified by their sex and by their science/non-science orientation. Our data showed a highly significant and fairly strong correlation between the motivation to learn science and the systemizing quotient. However, different from what we expected, we found no correlation between the motivation to learn science and the empathy quotient.
We also found no difference in the motivation to learn science neither for sex nor for science-orientation. The implications of these findings are discussed, especially in the light of school science and research of science education.

Citations

Downloads

85 downloads since deposited on 04 Mar 2011
20 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Education
Dewey Decimal Classification:370 Education
Language:English
Date:2010
Deposited On:04 Mar 2011 18:16
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:46
Publisher:Eurasia Publishing House
ISSN:1305-8223
Free access at:Official URL. An embargo period may apply.
Official URL:http://www.ejmste.com/v6n2/EURASIA_v6n2_Zeyer.pdf
Related URLs:http://www.ejmste.com/v6n2/main.html (Publisher)
Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-45586

Download

[img]
Preview
Filetype: PDF (Verlags-PDF)
Size: 190kB

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations